Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by FRANKEL, A. Articles by WENNERBERG, L. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Rupture process of the M_s 6.6 Superstition Hills, California, earthquake determined from strong-motion recordings: Application of tomographic source inversion

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 922 NATIONAL CENTER, RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

We analyze strong-motion recordings of the M_s 6.6 Superstition Hills earthquake to determine the timing, location, spatial extent, and rupture velocity of the subevents that produced the bulk of the high-frequency (0.5 to 4 Hz) seismic energy radiated by this shock. The earthquake can be characterized by three principal subevents, the largest ones occurring about 3 and 10 sec after initiation of rupture. Timing relationships between pulses on the seismograms indicate that the three subevents are located within 8 km of each other along the northern portion of the Superstition Hills fault. The two largest subevents display different directivity effects. We apply a tomographic source inversion to the integrated accelerograms to determine the slip acceleration on the fault as a function of time and distance, based on a one-dimensional fault model. The azimuthal distribution of amplitudes for the second subevent can be largely explained by a rupture that propagated about 2 km to the southeast along the Superstition Hills fault at a velocity about equal to the P-wave velocity. An alternative model with rupture propagating to the northeast along a conjugate fault plane can also account for the observed directivity of this subevent, but it is not supported by the aftershock distribution. The third subevent ruptured to the southeast along an 8-km long portion of the Superstition Hills fault at about the shear-wave velocity. This rupture propagation caused the relatively large accelerations and velocities observed in strong-motion records for stations southeast of the hypocenter. The long time intervals between the subevents and their relative proximity to each other indicate a very slow component to the rupture development. The southern half of the Superstition Hills fault did not generate significant high-frequency strong ground motion, although it showed substantial co-seismic surface displacement. The subevents are situated along the same northern portion of the fault where most of the aftershocks are located. The locations of the subevents appear to be controlled by bends in the fault mapped at the surface and by changes in basement structure at depth.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. G. Wesnousky Displacement and Geometrical Characteristics of Earthquake Surface Ruptures: Issues and Implications for Seismic-Hazard Analysis and the Process of Earthquake Rupture Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1609 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Observing Earthquakes Triggered in the Near Field by Dynamic Deformations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 118 - 138.

				M. Guatteri and M. Cocco On the variation of slip direction during earthquake rupture: Supporting and conflicting evidence from the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1935 - 1951. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. L. Harp and R. C. Wilson Shaking intensity thresholds for rock falls and slides: Evidence from 1987 Whittier Narrows and superstition hills earthquake strong-motion records Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1995; 85(6): 1739 - 1757. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. L. Ellsworth, W. L. Ellsworth, and G. C. Beroza Seismic Evidence for an Earthquake Nucleation Phase Science, May 12, 1995; 268(5212): 851 - 855. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. P. Cohee and G. C. Beroza Slip distribution of the 1992 Landers earthquake and its implications for earthquake source mechanics Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1994; 84(3): 692 - 712. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. SPUDICH and M. IIDA The seismic coda, site effects, and scattering in alluvial basins studied using aftershocks of the 1986 North Palm Springs, California, earthquake as source arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1993; 83(6): 1721 - 1743. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. FRANKEL Three-dimensional simulations of ground motions in the San Bernardino Valley, California, for hypothetical earthquakes on the San Andreas fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 1020 - 1041. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. FRANKEL Comment on "Rupture process of the 1987 Superstition Hills earthquake from the inversion of strong-motion data" by Wald et al. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1992; 82(3): 1511 - 1518. [PDF]

				D. J. WALD, S. H. HARTZELL, and D. V. HELMBERGER Reply to Arthur Frankel's "Comment on 'Rupture process of the 1987 Superstition Hills earthquake from the inversion of strong-motion data'" Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1992; 82(3): 1519 - 1533. [PDF]

				S. H. HARTZELL, G. S. STEWART, and C. MENDOZA Comparison of L1 and L2 norms in a teleseismic waveform inversion for the slip history of the Loma Prieta, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1991; 81(5): 1518 - 1539. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. WENNERBERG Stochastic summation of empirical Green's functions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1990; 80(6A): 1418 - 1432. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. WALD, D. V. HELMBERGER, and S. H. HARTZELL Rupture process of the 1987 Superstition Hills earthquake from the inversion of strong-motion data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1990; 80(5): 1079 - 1098. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. J. HWANG, H. MAGISTRALE, and H. KANAMORI Teleseismic source parameters and rupture characteristics of the 24 November 1987, Superstition Hills earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 43 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. C. HANKS and C. R. ALLEN The Elmore Ranch and Superstition Hills earthquakes of 24 November 1987: Introduction to the special issue Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1989; 79(2): 231 - 238. [PDF]

				K. W. HUDNUT and K. E. SIEH Behavior of the Superstition Hills fault during the past 330 years Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1989; 79(2): 304 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. SIPKIN Moment-tensor solutions for the 24 November 1987 Superstition Hills, California, earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1989; 79(2): 493 - 499. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. BENT, D. V. HELMBERGER, R. J. STEAD, and P. HO-LIU Waveform modeling of the November 1987 Superstition Hills earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1989; 79(2): 500 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF]