Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1989; v. 79; no. 6; p. 1846-1862
© 1989 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PUJOL, J.
Right arrow Articles by CHIN, B.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

On the relocation of earthquake clusters. A case history: The Arkansas earthquake swarm

JOSÉ PUJOL, JER-MING CHIU, ARCH JOHNSTON and BYAU-HENG CHIN*

CENTER FOR EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH AND INFORMATION MEMPHIS STATE UNIVERSITY, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE 38152

Abstract

A portable digital network (the PANDA array) of 40 three-component stations with an aperture of about 35 km was deployed for 4 months in the Arkansas swarm area in 1987. Only 12 swarm events occurred during the deployment, in contrast to the intense seismic activity that characterized this region in 1982 to 1984. These events were relocated using a joint hypocentral determination technique (JHD). The JHD method used here allows for the simultaneous determination of P- and S-wave station corrections while providing information on the uniqueness of the solution based on the singular values of a matrix related to the station corrections. P-wave station corrections, determined when all nonzero singular values were used in the computations (or with the two smallest nonzero singular values deleted), show a circular pattern of positive values surrounded by negative values. The epicentral area is localized slightly displaced from the center of the pattern. Since positive and negative corrections correspond to velocities that are lower and higher, respectively, than the average, our results indicate that the swarm area is characterized by seismic velocities lower than those of its surroundings. Independent information on this region is afforded by reflection seismic lines recorded in the swarm area and its vicinity, which show that the hypocenters are located in a region where strong reflectors completely lose their coherence, indicating that this volume is anomalous when compared to surrounding crust. Additional support for a low-velocity zone comes from the results of a 3-D velocity inversion of the same PANDA data. A selected subset of data recorded digitally by the USGS in 1982 was also relocated. Comparison with the results from the PANDA data shows that the seismic activity did not migrate over a 5-yr period and that it is concentrated within a small volume between about 3 km and 6 km depth. While the results of this study do not determine the ultimate cause of the Arkansas swarm, the discovery of a pronounced localized low velocity zone is consistent with a previously proposed magmatic intrusion or a zone of highly fractured, fluid-filled crust.

Footnotes

* Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Southern California, University Park, Los Angeles, California 90089.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
New Evidence for Segmentation of the Alaska Subduction Zone
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1754 - 1765.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. A. Ratchkovsky, J. Pujol, and N. N. Biswas
Relocation of earthquakes in the Cook Inlet area, south central Alaska, using the joint hypocenter determination method
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1997; 87(3): 620 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. PUJOL, J. M. CHIU, R. SMALLEY Jr., M. REGNIER, B. ISACKS, J. L. CHATELAIN, J. VLASITY, D. VLASITY, J. CASTANO, and N. PUEBLA
Lateral velocity variations in the Andean foreland in Argentina determined with the JHD method
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1991; 81(6): 2441 - 2457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. PUJOL and R. SMALLEY Jr.
A preliminary earthquake location method based on a hyperbolic approximation to travel times
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1990; 80(6A): 1629 - 1642.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. PUJOL and R. ASTER
Joint hypocentral determination and the detection of low-velocity anomalies. An example from the Phlegraean Fields earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America