Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by TAYLOR, D. W. A. Articles by TAKANAMI, T. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Nonlinear frequency-magnitude relationships for the Hokkaido corner, Japan

ENSCO, INC., 445 PINEDA COURT, MELBOURNE, FLORIDA 32940
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY, BLACKSBURG, VIRGINIA 24061
DEPARTMENT OF TERRESTRIAL MAGNETISM CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON, 5241 BROAD BRANCH ROAD NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20015
RESEARCH CENTER FOR EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION FACULTY OF SCIENCE HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY, SAPPORO, Japan

Abstract

Frequency-magnitude relationships are determined for a source region defined by a circular epicentral area of 50 km radius centered on the Carnegie broadband seismograph at KMU in the southeast corner of Hokkaido Island, Japan. Within this region, bounded by a maximum depth of 125 km, more than 11,100 earthquakes were detected and cataloged by the Hokkaido University network during the period July 1976 through January 1987. The seismicity is divided into two effectively decoupled suites: crustal (Eurasian plate) and subduction (Pacific plate). The frequency-magnitude recurrence distributions exhibit departures from linearity which are statistically significant below m_d = 2.5 for the crustal data suite and m_d = 3.5 for the subduction data suite. Three independent tests show the nonlinearity is not caused by incompleteness; the catalog is complete down to magnitude 2.0 or less for both data suites. These observations are therefore inconsistent with the linear Gutenberg-Richter relationship, which is assumed to be valid over any magnitude range for which the data are complete. There are relatively more large events and fewer small events in the subduction suite. The logarithm of the ratio of the number of crustal events to the number of subduction events versus magnitude is monotonically decreasing and remarkably linear over the magnitude range 1.0 to 5.0. This suggests that the observed nonlinearity of these two frequency-magnitude relationships has a common origin.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Amorese Applying a Change-Point Detection Method on Frequency-Magnitude Distributions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1742 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Wyss and R. Stefansson Nucleation Points of Recent Mainshocks in Southern Iceland, Mapped by b-Values Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 599 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Woessner and S. Wiemer Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 684 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Comment on "Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan," by Stefan Wiemer and Max Wyss Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1862 - 1867.

				Reply to "Comment on `Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan,' by Stefan Wiemer and Max Wyss," by Paul A. Rydelek and I. S. Sacks Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1868 - 1871.

				Seismicity in Deep Gold Mines of South Africa: Implications for Tectonic Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1766 - 1782.

				Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2000; 90(4): 859 - 869.

				I. Selwyn Sacks and P. A. Rydelek Earthquake "Quanta" as an explanation for observed magnitudes and stress drops Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1995; 85(3): 808 - 813. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. H. SPEIDEL and P. H. MATTSON The polymodal frequency-magnitude relationship of earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1993; 83(6): 1893 - 1901. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. UMINO and I. S. SACKS Magnitude-frequency relations for northeastern Japan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1993; 83(5): 1492 - 1506. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. W. A. TAYLOR, J. A. SNOKE, I. S. SACKS, and T. TAKANAMI Seismic quiescence before the Urakawa-Oki earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1991; 81(4): 1255 - 1271. [Abstract] [PDF]