Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1990; v. 80; no. 5; p. 1057-1078
© 1990 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KING, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by WORLEY, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Seismic ground-response studies in Olympia, Washington, and vicinity

K. W. KING, A. C. TARR, D. L. CARVER, R. A. WILLIAMS and D. M. WORLEY

UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, BOX 25046 MS 966, DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225

Abstract

Relative seismic ground-response characteristics in the cities of Olympia, Lacey, and Tumwater, Washington, were determined from analysis of instrumentally recorded ground motion induced by blasts at an open-pit coal mine near Centralia, Washington. A ground-response function (GRF), defined as the ratio of Fourier spectral amplitudes at an alluvium site to spectral amplitudes on hard rock, is a measure of amplification of seismic waves by localized site conditions. GRF values in three frequency bands (0.5 to 1.0 Hz, 1.0 to 2.0 Hz, and 2.0 to 4.0 Hz) were compared with observed Modified Mercalli (MM) intensities from the 29 April 1965, Puget Sound earthquake and with mapped surficial geologic units. Typically, the GRF values relate well with the surficial geological units.

In addition, MM intensities within the V to VII range appear to be directly related to the frequencies within the 0.5 to 4.0 Hz bandwidth such that MM V intensity sites had a lower GRF value in the 2.0 to 4.0 Hz bandwidth as compared to the 0.5 to 2.0 Hz bandwidth, and the MM VII intensity sites had higher GRF values in the 2.0 to 4.0 Hz bandwidth as compared to the 0.5 to 2.0 Hz bandwidth. The set of GRF values determined for the city of Olympia and its vicinity should be useful in formulating a theoretical relative ground-response model for the southern Puget Sound area.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Carver and S. H. Hartzell
Earthquake site response in Santa Cruz, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1A): 55 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
X.-S. Hao, K. Seo, and T. Samano
Low damage anomaly of the 1976 Tangshan earthquake: an analysis based on the explosion ground motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1994; 84(4): 1018 - 1027.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. SU., K. AKI, T. TENG, Y. ZENG, S. KOYANAGI, and K. MAYEDA
The relation between site amplification factor and surficial geology in central California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1992; 82(2): 580 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America