Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by KREBES, E. S. Articles by SLAWINSKI, M. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

On raytracing in an elastic-anelastic medium

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY, CALGARY, ALBERTA, Canada , T2N 1N4

Abstract

In this article, we investigate seismic wave propagation in a medium consisting of a stack of anelastic layers sandwiched between two half-spaces. The upper half-space is perfectly elastic, and the lower half-space is anelastic. The source is in the upper elastic half-space. To compute a ray going from the source to the receiver (which can be anywhere in the medium), we examine two approaches. The first involves an evaluation of the Sommerfeld wavefield integral by the method of steepest descent, and we refer to the resulting ray as the stationary ray. The second involves assuming that the attenuation vector A₁ of the initial ray segment emerging from the source in the elastic half-space is zero (an assumption often made in the literature), and we refer to the resulting ray as the conventional ray. We find that the stationary and conventional rays are, in general, not identical, in that the stationary ray has (a) a complex, rather than real, ray parameter; (b) a smaller travel time; (c) an initial ray segment that corresponds to an inhomogeneous elastic plane body wave (A₁ 0); and (d) a substantially different value for the ray amplitude. The stationary ray actually has the smallest travel time of all possible rays, and hence it is the one that satisfies Fermat's principle of least time. Our results suggest that the stationary ray method is the correct method and that the conventional ray method is generally incorrect. The results might also find application in marine seismology, since water is practically a lossless medium.

Footnotes

^* Present address: Chevron Canada Resources, 500 5th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 0L7.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. E. Quiroga-Goode, E. S. Krebes, and L. H. T. Le Modeling viscoelastic waves: a comparison of ray theory and the finite-difference method Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1994; 84(6): 1882 - 1888. [Abstract] [PDF]