Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1991; v. 81; no. 3; p. 862-881
© 1991 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAVAGE, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Criticism of some forecasts of the national earthquake prediction evaluation council

J. C. SAVAGE

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, MS/977, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

The Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities has assigned probabilities for rupture in the interval from 1988 to 2018 to various segments of the San Andreas fault on the basis of the lognormal distribution of recurrence times of characteristic earthquakes postulated by Nishenko and Buland (1987). I question the validity of those probabilities on the basis of three separate arguments: (1) The distributions of recurrence times of the four, best-observed, characteristic-earthquake sequences are each only marginally consistent with the Nishenko - Buland Iognormal distribution. (2) The range of possible 30-year conditional probabilities for many of the fault segments is so great due to uncertainty in the average recurrence time for that segment that the assigned probability is virtually meaningless. (3) The 1988 forecasts not subject to the foregoing objection are those in which there is a low probability of an earthquake in the near future (e.g., only a 5 per cent chance of rupture of the North Coast segment before the year 2049 and of the Carrizo segment before the year 2018). The same reasoning would assign only a 5 per cent chance of rupture before mid-1993 to the southern Santa Cruz Mountains segment, the segment that failed in October 1989. Finally, the forecast of the next Parkfield earthquake (95 per cent probability before 1993.0) by Bakun and Lindh (1985) depends upon an ad hoc explanation of the out-of-sequence 1934 earthquake. A less-contrived forecast would have assigned a conditional probability of about 60 ± 20 per cent to the 1985.0 to 1993.0 interval and 30 ± 15 per cent to the 1990.0 to 1993.0 interval.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Parsons and E. L. Geist
Is There a Basis for Preferring Characteristic Earthquakes over a Gutenberg-Richter Distribution in Probabilistic Earthquake Forecasting?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 2012 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. Akinci, F. Galadini, D. Pantosti, M. Petersen, L. Malagnini, and D. Perkins
Effect of Time Dependence on Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Maps and Deaggregation for the Central Apennines, Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 585 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
J. S. Hebden and S. Stein
Time-dependent Seismic Hazard Maps for the New Madrid Seismic Zone and Charleston, South Carolina, Areas
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 12 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field
A Summary of Previous Working Groups on California Earthquake Probabilities
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1033 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. Yakovlev, D. L. Turcotte, J. B. Rundle, and P. B. Rundle
Simulation-Based Distributions of Earthquake Recurrence Times on the San Andreas Fault System
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 1995 - 2007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. R. Sykes and W. Menke
Repeat Times of Large Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Mechanics and Long-Term Prediction
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1569 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. J. Lienkaemper, B. Baker, and F. S. McFarland
Surface Slip Associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake Measured on Alinement Arrays
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S239 - S249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Variability of Near-Term Probability for the Next Great Earthquake on the Cascadia Subduction Zone
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1954 - 1959.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Paleoseismic Event Dating and the Conditional Probability of Large Earthquakes on the Southern San Andreas Fault, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2002; 92(7): 2761 - 2781.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
The Earthquake Potential of the New Madrid Seismic Zone
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2080 - 2089.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
1857 Slip on the San Andreas Fault Southeast of Cholame, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1659 - 1672.



Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Parsons, S. Toda, R. S. Stein, A. Barka, and J. H. Dieterich
Heightened Odds of Large Earthquakes Near Istanbul: An Interaction-Based Probability Calculation
Science, April 28, 2000; 288(5466): 661 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A Time-Dependent Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Model for California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 1 - 21.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabiliti
Seismic hazards in Southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 379 - 439.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. C. Savage
Empirical earthquake probabilities from observed recurrence intervals
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1994; 84(1): 219 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. C. SAVAGE
The Parkfield prediction fallacy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1993; 83(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. C. HANKS and H. KRAWINKLER
The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake and its effects: Introduction to the special issue
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1991; 81(5): 1415 - 1423.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America