Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1992; v. 82; no. 2; p. 870-882
© 1992 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KVAERNA, T.
Right arrow Articles by RINGDAL, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Integrated array and three-component processing using a seismic microarray

TORMOD KVAERNA and FRODE RINGDAL

NORSAR, P.O. BOX 51, N-2007 KJELLER Norway

Abstract

A "microarray" as defined in this paper is modeled on a sub-geometry of the NORESS array, and comprises a 3-component center seismometer surrounded by 3 closely spaced vertical-component sensors deployed over a typical aperture of 0.3 km. Analysis of five days of continuous data has shown that such a system combines the benefits of array and 3-component processing in providing reliable automatic detection, phase identification and azimuth estimation of weak seismic events at local and regional distances. Using vertical components only, broadband f-k array analysis enables correct phase identification (P-type or S-type phase) in 95% of the cases, and gives S-wave azimuths with a root-mean-square (RMS) deviation of 13.9 degrees from the estimates of the full NORESS array. It is particularly significant that the small array eliminates the need for introducing particle motion models, which creates ambiguities in 3-component analysis of secondary phases when interfering SH and SV phases occur. P-phase azimuths are estimated using integrated array and 3-component f-k analysis, and have an RMS deviation relative to NORESS of only 9.6 degrees. Compared to the full NORESS array, the P-wave detection capability is reduced, especially for epicentral distances greater than 500 km. The S-phase detection capability is enhanced by incoherent beamforming of the horizontal channels, and approaches that of NORESS at all distances. A considerable reduction in the detector false alarm rate is achieved by imposing constraints on the estimates of apparent velocity obtained from the f-k analysis before accepting a detected phase.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. O. RUUD, C. D. LINDHOLM, and E. S. HUSEBYE
An exercise in automating seismic record analysis and network bulletin production
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1993; 83(3): 660 - 679.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America