Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1992; v. 82; no. 4; p. 1840-1866
© 1992 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DU, Y.
Right arrow Articles by SEGALL, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Comparison of various inversion techniques as applied to the determination of a geophysical deformation model for the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake

YIJUN DU*, ATILLA AYDIN* and PAUL SEGALL

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES PURDUE UNIVERSITY, WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA 47907
2 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
DEPARTMENT OF GEOPHYSICS STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305

Abstract

A number of techniques are employed to overcome nonuniqueness and instability inherent in linear inverse problems. To test the factors that enter into the selection of an inversion technique for fault slip distribution, we used a penalty function with smoothness (PF + S), a damped least-squares method (DLS), damped least-squares method with a positivity constraint (DLS + P), and a penalty function with smoothness and a positivity constraint (PF + S + P) for inverting the elevation changes for slip associated with the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake. Unlike solving an ill-posed inverse problem using a gradient technique (Ward and Barrientos, 1986), we have restored the well-posed character between the elevation changes and normal slip distribution. Studies showed that the constraints based on sound understanding of the physical nature of the problem are crucial in the derivation of a meaningful solution and dictates primarily the selection of a particular inversion technique. All available geological and geophysical information were used to determine a geophysical deformation model for the earthquake. It is suggested that the PF + S + P solution for a fault length of 75 km is the preferred model. The long wavelength features in the estimated slip distribution are similar to those obtained by Ward and Barrientos (1986), whereas the shorter wavelength features differ between two solutions. The fault dips 49° to the southwest. The slipped zones deepen from the surface at the northwest to about 20-km downdip depth at the southeast. The fault extends to the southeast beyond the epicenter of the mainshock. It is also shown that only the long wavelength features of the slip distribution are well resolved. The resolution is better at shallower levels than at deeper levels. The resolution deteriorates when the deformation sources are away from the leveling lines. Smoothness constraints provide better resolution than damping does at depth. The addition of a positivity constraint significantly improves the model resolution.

Footnotes

* Present address: Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Fukuda and K. M. Johnson
A Fully Bayesian Inversion for Spatial Distribution of Fault Slip with Objective Smoothing
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1128 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Murray and J. Langbein
Slip on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California, over Two Earthquake Cycles, and the Implications for Seismic Hazard
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S283 - S303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. Maerten, P. Resor, D. Pollard, and L. Maerten
Inverting for Slip on Three-Dimensional Fault Surfaces Using Angular Dislocations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1654 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou
A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1099 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Observing Earthquakes Triggered in the Near Field by Dynamic Deformations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 118 - 138.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Interactions between the Landers and Hector Mine, California, Earthquakes from Space Geodesy, Boundary Element Modeling, and Time-Dependent Friction
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1450 - 1469.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Deformation during the 12 November 1999 Duzce, Turkey, Earthquake, from GPS and InSAR Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 161 - 171.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Freymueller, N. E. King, and P. Segall
The co-seismic slip distribution of the Landers earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1994; 84(3): 646 - 659.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. O. Johnson, D. C. Agnew, and K. Hudnut
Extremal bounds on earthquake movement from geodetic data: Application to the Landers earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1994; 84(3): 660 - 667.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America