Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1992; v. 82; no. 4; p. 1867-1888
© 1992 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RAJENDRAN, K.
Right arrow Articles by TALWANI, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The role of elastic, undrained, and drained responses in triggering earthquakes at Monticello Reservoir, South Carolina

KUSALA RAJENDRAN and PRADEEP TALWANI

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA 29208

Abstract

Following reservoir impoundment, stress changes occur due to elastic response and changes in pore pressure due to drained and undrained responses of the substratum. Elastic response may stabilize or destabilize the reservoir environment, depending on the nature of pre-existing stress field. However, the increase in pore pressure always leads to weakening of the rocks, facilitating the onset of seismicity. In most reservoirs, we usually observe the coupled poroelastic effect, and it is usually difficult to isolate individual contributions.

Due to the availability of detailed seismicity and geological and in situ stress data at Monticello Reservoir, it was possible to study various factors that control the mechanism of reservoir-induced seismicity. Our results suggest that, during the filling period, the instability resulted from elastic, undrained, and possibly onset of drained response. Subsequently, the seismicity showed a more consistent pattern associated with diffusion of pore pressure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Mechanism of Initial Seismicity Following Impoundment of the Monticello Reservoir, South Carolina
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1582 - 1594.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. M. Ferreira, R. T. D. Oliveira, M. Assumpcao, J. A. M. Moreira, R. G. Pearce, and M. K. Takeya
Correlation of seismicity and water level in the Acu reservoir--an example from Northeast Brazil
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1995; 85(5): 1483 - 1489.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America