Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MADABHUSHI, S. Articles by TALWANI, P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Fault plane solutions and relocations of recent earthquakes in Middleton Place Summerville Seismic Zone near Charleston, South Carolina

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA SC 29201

Abstract

The Middleton Place Summerville Seismic Zone (MPSSZ), located about 20 km northwest of Charleston is the most active seismic zone in South Carolina. Between 1980 and 1991, 58 events with M_d 0.8 to 3.3 were recorded in MPSSZ. They lie in a diffuse area of 11 km by 14 km of which over two-thirds are located in a narrow 5 km by 6-km zone. The hypocentral depths range from 2 to 11 km with over 90% deeper than 4 km.

Single fault plane solutions were obtained for 35 events. Based on the focal mechanisms the earthquakes were grouped into five subsets. The mean P-axis of all fault plane solutions is oriented N63°E, in general agreement with the direction of S_Hmax obtained from in situ stress measurements.

Of the 35 events, 18 are associated with reverse faulting on NW - SE striking and SW dipping fault planes. These events were inferred to be associated with the Ashley River fault zone, which is not a planar feature, but is composed of short segments of varying strikes (N20°W to N70°W) and dips (40° to 70°SW). Eleven events were associated with strike-slip motion on NNE - SSW striking vertical faults and with thrust faulting on N - S oriented faults dipping to the west, respectively. These two sets are identified as being parts of the Woodstock fault zone.

The concentrated zone of seismicity included events associated with both the ARF and WF zones suggesting that it is at the intersection of these two fault zones.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Talwani and I. Dura-Gomez Finding Faults in the Charleston Area, South Carolina: 2. Complementary Data Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 901 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Jaume Shear Wave Velocity Profiles via Seismic Cone Penetration Test and Refraction Microtremor Techniques at ANSS Strong Motion Sites in Charleston, South Carolina Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2006; 77(6): 771 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Chapman, P. Talwani, and R. C. Cannon Ground-Motion Attenuation in the Atlantic Coastal Plain near Charleston, South Carolina Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 998 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Weems and W. C. Lewis Structural and tectonic setting of the Charleston, South Carolina, region: Evidence from the Tertiary stratigraphic record Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2002; 114(1): 24 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. T. Marple and P. Talwani Evidence for a buried fault system in the Coastal Plain of the Carolinas and Virginia--Implications for neotectonics in the southeastern United States Geological Society of America Bulletin, February 1, 2000; 112(2): 200 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]