Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1994; v. 84; no. 2; p. 415-425
© 1994 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abe, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Instrumental magnitudes of historical earthquakes, 1892 to 1898

Katsuyuki Abe

Earthquake Research Institute The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113, Japan

Abstract

In the 1890s of the dawn of instrumental seismology, a variety of primitive but sophisticated seismographs were erected in Europe. The quality varies greatly from instrument to instrument. In use of those records, the instrument magnification needs to be calibrated with extreme caution, because of the lack of damping. From comparison of the trace amplitudes measured by such instruments with those by reliable instruments, the effective gain for surface-wave maxima of distant shocks is determined here for each of the vertical or horizontal pendulums that were operated at Catania, Rocca di Papa, Ischia, Roma, Padua, Nicolajew, Charkow, Strassburg, and Shide. The effective gain is found to be greatly different from the static magnification. The period of surface-wave maxima is on average 17 sec. The results are applied to reported amplitudes for determining the surface-wave magnitude of 53 major earthquakes recorded from 1892 to 1898. The magnitude of the destructive tsunami earthquake that occurred off northeastern Honshu, Japan, on 15 June 1896 is determined to be 7.2. The great Assam, India earthquake of 12 June 1897 has a magnitude of 8.0. The present study demonstrates that despite various difficulties, historical records, if properly interpreted, provide invaluable information.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. Bungum, F. Pettenati, J. Schweitzer, L. Sirovich, and J. I. Faleide
The 23 October 1904 MS 5.4 Oslofjord Earthquake: Reanalysis Based on Macroseismic and Instrumental Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2836 - 2854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Earthquakes and Associated Deformation in Northern Baluchistan 1892-2001
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1573 - 1605.


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Reevaluated Intensities for the Great Assam Earthquake of 12 June 1897, Shillong, India
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 655 - 673.


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. P. Satyabala and H. K. Gupta
Is the quiescence of major earthquakes (M greater double equals 7.5) Since 1952 in the Himalaya and northeast India real?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1983 - 1986.
[Abstract] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America