Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Andrews, D. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Dynamic growth of mixed-mode shear cracks

U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94026

Abstract

A pure mode II (in-plane) shear crack cannot propagate spontaneously at a speed between the Rayleigh and S-wave speeds, but a three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) mixed-mode shear crack can propagate in this range, being driven by the mode III (antiplane) component. Two different analytic solutions have been proposed for the mode II component in this case. The first is the solution valid for crack speed less than the Rayleigh speed. When applied above the Rayleigh speed, it predicts a negative stress intensity factor, which implies that energy is generated at the crack tip. Burridge proposed a second solution, which is continuous at the crack tip, but has a singularity in slip velocity at the Rayleigh wave. Spontaneous propagation of a mixed-mode rupture has been calculated with a slip-weakening friction law, in which the slip velocity vector is colinear with the total traction vector. Spontaneous trans-Rayleigh rupture speed has been found. The solution depends on the absolute stress level. The solution for the in-plane component appears to be a superposition of smeared-out versions of the two analytic solutions. The proportion of the first solution increases with increasing absolute stress. The amplitude of the negative in-plane traction pulse is less than the absolute final sliding traction, so that total in-plane traction does not reverse. The azimuth of the slip velocity vector varies rapidly between the onset of slip and the arrival of the Rayleigh wave. The variation is larger at smaller absolute stress.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Inferring Segment Strength Contrasts and Boundaries along Low-Friction Faults Using Surface Offset Data, with an Example from the Cholame-Carrizo Segment Boundary along the San Andreas Fault, Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2001; 91(3): 427 - 440.

				T. Sato and H. Kanamori Beginning of earthquakes modeled with the Griffith's fracture criterion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1999; 89(1): 80 - 93. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Guatteri and P. Spudich Coseismic temporal changes of slip direction: The effect of absolute stress on dynamic rupture Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1998; 88(3): 777 - 789. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Spudich, M. Guatteri, K. Otsuki, and J. Minagawa Use of fault striations and dislocation models to infer tectonic shear stress during the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 413 - 427. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Guatteri and M. Cocco On the variation of slip direction during earthquake rupture: Supporting and conflicting evidence from the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1935 - 1951. [Abstract] [PDF]