Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Habermann, R. E. Articles by Creamer, F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Catalog errors and the M8 earthquake prediction algorithm

NOAA/National Geophysical Data Center CIRES/University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80303-3328
CIRES/Department of Geological Sciences University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80303-3328

Abstract

The goal of earthquake prediction algorithm research efforts is to identify patterns in data that characteristically occur prior to large earthquakes. Most of these algorithms implicitly assume that variations in the data they examine are related to actual changes in physical processes occurring in the Earth. In the case of seismicity data, most of the observed variations are, in fact, related to changes in the system for detecting and reporting earthquakes and not to actual changes in the Earth. We have tested the earthquake prediction algorithm M8 using five different seismicity data sets for the southwest Pacific. We demonstrate that the alarms identified by M8 are strongly dependent on the seismicity catalog used. The alarms occur preferentially during times when magnitudes are relatively high because of systematic errors. These alarms cannot be reasonably interpreted as precursors to earthquakes or any other real change in the Earth without first understanding and correcting the errors in the seismicity catalogs. This study highlights the need for improving the quality of geophysical data, which is presently unsuitable for many studies related to earthquake prediction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Woessner and S. Wiemer Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 684 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				On the Validation of Earthquake-Forecasting Models: The Case of Pattern Recognition Algorithms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 1994 - 2004.

				M. Wyss;, R. L. Aceves, S. K. Park;, R. J. Geller, D. D. Jackson, Y. Y. Kagan, and F. Mulargia; Cannot Earthquakes Be Predicted? Science, October 17, 1997; 278(5337): 487 - 490. [Full Text]