Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1995; v. 85; no. 2; p. 440-451
© 1995 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cramer, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Weak-motion observations and modeling for the Turkey Flat, U.S., Site-Effects Test Area near Parkfield, California

C. H. Cramer

California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, California 95814-3531

Abstract

In order to determine the stability of the weak-motion site response and test the ability of geotechnical measurements to predict site response, empirical transfer functions and theoretical site amplification functions were compared at several sites across Turkey Flat Site-Effects Test Area near Parkfield, California. Observed site response relative to a bedrock reference site was determined for a given site by using the Fourier amplitude spectral ratio method. Two separate studies were conducted: a profile study and a site-specific study. Surface bedrock site response between two cross-valley rock stations separated by 2 km agreed to within 30%. Sensor separations of 10 and 20 m were used in the profile study at several sites spaced 100 m apart out onto the valley of the test area. Surface stiff-soil site response over a sensor separation of 10 m is reproducible to within 30%. For sensor separations of 20 m there are occasional significant variations in stiff-soil site response by a factor of 2 to 3 in the 10 to 20 Hz band. For sensor separations of 100 m there are systematic variations in stiff-soil site response by a factor of 3 to 10 in the 5- to 20-Hz band related to variations in soil thickness. Site-specific weak-motion mean spectral ratios and their standard deviations (Sd's) serve as empirical predictions of strong-motion transfer functions for the stiff-soil conditions found at Turkey Flat.

Observed transfer functions were modeled using relative amplification functions from the computer program SHAKE. A better fit to the amplitude of resonance peaks is obtained using damping values close to those measured in situ as opposed to damping values determined by laboratory tests. Inaccuracies in the standard geotechnical model for Turkey Flat (Real, 1988) lead to inaccuracies in calculated weak-motion transfer functions when compared with observations. Modeling of observed transfer functions indicates that the model fit is sensitive to 5% changes in S-wave velocity. Uncertainties of 10 to 20% in field measurements of S-wave velocity at Turkey Flat suggest that accurate and consistent prediction of weak motion may not be possible when based on field geotechnical measurements alone.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. O. L. Kwok, J. P. Stewart, and Y. M. A. Hashash
Nonlinear Ground-Response Analysis of Turkey Flat Shallow Stiff-Soil Site to Strong Ground Motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 331 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Q. Miao and C. A. Langston
Empirical Distance Attenuation and the Local-Magnitude Scale for the Central United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2137 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Local Earthquake Wave Propagation through Mississippi Embayment Sediments, Part I: Body-Wave Phases and Local Site Responses
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2664 - 2684.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Riepl, P.-Y. Bard, D. Hatzfeld, C. Papaioannou, and S. Nechtschein
Detailed evaluation of site-response estimation methods across and along the sedimentary valley of volvi (EURO-SEISTEST)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 488 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Toshinawa, J. J. Taber, and J. B. Berrill
Distribution of ground-motion intensity inferred from questionnaire survey, earthquake recordings, and microtremor measurements--A case study in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the 1994 arthurs pass earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1997; 87(2): 356 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. P. Jarpe and P. W. Kasameyer
Validation of a procedure for calculating broadband strong-motion time histories with empirical Green's functions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1996; 86(4): 1116 - 1129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. M. Day
RMS response of a one-dimensional half-space to SH
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1996; 86(2): 363 - 370.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America