Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1996; v. 86; no. 4; p. 981-990
© 1996 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pitarka, A.
Right arrow Articles by Takenaka, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Elastic finite-difference modeling of strong motion in Ashigara Valley for the 1990 Odawara, Japan, earthquake

Arben Pitarka, Daisuke Suetsugu and Hiroshi Takenaka

Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto, 611 Japan
International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering 1 Tatehara, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Faculty of Science Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-81, Japan

Abstract

Finite-difference seismograms are calculated for the 1990 Odawara earthquake to model transverse and radial components of strong-motion data. Using a basin structure derived from a geotechnical survey and double-couple solution determined from P first-motion data and SH/SV amplitude ratio, two-dimensional SH and P/SV finite-difference calculation, along with correction for soft surface layers, reproduces the observed spatial variation in amplitude and waveform of the transverse and radial records at the Ashigara Valley blind prediction sites for frequencies up to 2 Hz. Comparison of the synthetic and the observed seismograms suggests that the observed spatial variation in the SH amplitude is attributed to the source radiation and amplification due to the soft surface layers, while the SV amplitude variation is controlled by the amplification due to the sedimentary basin as well as the source and surface-layer effects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
3D Site Effects: A Thorough Analysis of a High-Quality Dataset
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1941 - 1951.


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. J. Chavez-Garcia, W. R. Stephenson, and M. Rodriguez
Lateral propagation effects observed at Parkway, New Zealand. A case history to compare 1D versus 2D site effects
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1999; 89(3): 718 - 732.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. Pitarka, K. Irikura, T. Iwata, and H. Sekiguchi
Three-dimensional simulation of the near-fault ground motion for the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan, earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 428 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Jongmans, K. Pitilakis, D. Demanet, D. Raptakis, J. Riepl, C. Horrent, G. Tsokas, K. Lontzetidis, and P.-Y. Bard
EURO-SEISTEST: Determination of the geological structure of the Volvi basin and validation of the basin response
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 473 - 487.
[Abstract] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America