Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lettis, W. R. Articles by Baldwin, J. N. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Empirical observations regarding reverse earthquakes, blind thrust faults, and quaternary deformation: Are blind thrust faults truly blind?

William Lettis & Associates, Inc., 1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 262, Walnut Creek, California 94596(510) 256-6070; (510) 256-6076; lettis{at}lettis.comand baldwin{at}lettis.com
Geomatrix Consultants, Inc., 100 Pine Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111(415) 434-9400; (415) 434-3216;dwells{at}geomatrix.com

Abstract

Active thrust faults pose a significant seismic hazard worldwide. Many of these faults include "blind" thrusts, where the propagating fault tip does not reach the Earth's surface, and "buried" faults, where the geomorphic expression of the fault is obscured by subsequent sedimentation and/or erosion. This raises the issue of whether conventional geologic, geomorphic, and paleoseismic methods can be used to identify and characterize thrust faults for the assessment of seismic hazards or whether these faults sometimes are truly "blind." We compiled a data base of 148 worldwide moderate- to large-magnitude thrust/reverse earthquakes to evaluate whether or not the event occurred on a fault that could have been identified prior to the earthquake on the basis of recognizable Quaternary surface deformation (i.e., a pre-existing fault or fold). Analysis of the data shows that interplate reverse earthquakes almost always are associated with pre-existing Quaternary deformation that was or could have been recognized prior to the earthquake. In particular, most interplate reverse earthquakes are associated with an active reverse fault at the surface and/or an active anticline. In contrast, intraplate reverse earthquakes seldom occur on faults associated with pre-existing recognizable surface deformation. We conclude that thrust faults can be detected in interplate regions with careful Quaternary geologic and geomorphic mapping; furthermore, the absence of Quaternary surface deformation can be used to infer the absence of an underlying active blind thrust fault in interplate tectonic settings. However, the data show that Quaternary geologic mapping techniques alone likely are insufficient to characterize blind thrusts in intraplate regions. In these areas, inclusion of a floating or random earthquake may be necessary to assess earthquake hazards.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Bemis and W. K. Wallace Neotectonic framework of the north-central Alaska Range foothills Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 431(0): 549 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.E. Jordan, N. Munoz, M. Hein, T. Lowenstein, L. Godfrey, and J. Yu Active faulting and folding without topographic expression in an evaporite basin, Chile Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2002; 114(11): 1406 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Coastal Uplift of the San Joaquin Hills, Southern Los Angeles Basin, California, by a Large Earthquake since A.D. 1635 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 590 - 599.

				Stress Drop, Slip Type, Earthquake Magnitude, and Seismic Hazard Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2001; 91(4): 694 - 707.

				Late Quaternary Fold Deformation along the Northridge Hills Fault, Northridge, California: Deformation Coincident with Past Northridge Blind-Thrust Earthquakes and Other Nearby Structures? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2000; 90(3): 629 - 642.