Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1997; v. 87; no. 5; p. 1259-1266
© 1997 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dreger, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The large aftershocks of the Northridge earthquake and their relationship to mainshock slip and fault-zone complexity

Douglas Dreger

Seismological Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720

Abstract

The distribution of fault slip for the Northridge mainshock and two MW greater double equals 6 aftershocks is estimated using an approach that inverts the far-field momentrate functions derived by empirical Green's function deconvolution. The slip for these events was found to have a strong negative correlation with the locations of small aftershocks, and there is a notable clustering of aftershocks near the edges of slip, suggesting that these events are triggered by a redistribution of stress following the mainshock rupture. The two largest aftershocks ruptured the updip regions adjacent to the leading edge of the mainshock rupture. One aftershock, 11 hr after the main event, initiated 8 km west of the mainshock slip terminus and ruptured east to the western edge of mainshock slip. This event was found to have ruptured the same south-dipping fault as the mainshock. The two events, however, are separated by a lateral offset in the depth of seismicity that serves as a geometrical barrier to through-going rupture. An MW 6.2 aftershock approximately 1 min after the main event is inferred to have ruptured an updip region of the mainshock fault that is relatively devoid of small aftershock seismicity. This event was located at the eastern edge of the sequence that overlaps with the north-dipping fault responsible for the 1971 San Fernando earthquake. Although the south-dipping plane is favored for this aftershock, it is not possible to rule out that it occurred on the north-dipping fault structure, or within the hanging block of the mainshock.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Pujol, K. Mueller, P. Shen, and V. Chitupolu
High-Resolution 3D P-Wave Velocity Model for the East Ventura-San Fernando Basin, California, and Relocation of Events in the Northridge and San Fernando Aftershock Sequences
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2269 - 2280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
M. A. Ellis and A. L. Densmore
First-order topography over blind thrusts
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 398(0): 251 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Hearn and R. Burgmann
The Effect of Elastic Layering on Inversions of GPS Data for Coseismic Slip and Resulting Stress Changes: Strike-Slip Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1637 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
J. Langbein, R. Borcherdt, D. Dreger, J. Fletcher, J. L. Hardebeck, M. Hellweg, C. Ji, M. Johnston, J. R. Murray, R. Nadeau, et al.
Preliminary Report on the 28 September 2004, M 6.0 Parkfield, California Earthquake
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2005; 76(1): 10 - 26.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
D. S. Dreger, L. Gee, P. Lombard, M. H. Murray, and B. Romanowicz
Rapid Finite-source Analysis and Near-fault Strong Ground Motions: Application to the 2003 Mw 6.5 San Simeon and 2004 Mw 6.0 Parkfield Earthquakes
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2005; 76(1): 40 - 48.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
The Seismogenic Thickness of the Southern California Crust
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 940 - 960.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Antolik and D. S. Dreger
Rupture Process of the 26 January 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj, India, Earthquake from Teleseismic Broadband Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1235 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Asperity Model of an Earthquake: Static Problem
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 672 - 686.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. Delouis and D. Legrand
Focal mechanism determination and identification of the fault plane of earthquakes using only one or two near-source seismic recordings
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1558 - 1574.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. S. Stein and T. C. Hanks
M greater double equals 6 earthquakes in southern California during the twentieth century: No evidence for a seismicity or moment deficit
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1998; 88(3): 635 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America