Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1997; v. 87; no. 5; p. 1345-1353
© 1997 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savage, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Surface strain accumulation and the seismic moment tensor

J. C. Savage and R. W. Simpson

U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025

Abstract

Although the scalar moment accumulation rate within the seismogenic zone beneath a given area is sometimes deduced from the observed average surface strain accumulation rate over that same area (e.g., Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 1995), the correspondence between the two is very uncertain. The equivalence between surface strain accumulation and scalar moment accumulation is based on Kostrov's (1974) relation between the average strain rate over a volume and the moment-rate tensor for that volume. The average strain rate over the volume is replaced by the average strain rate measured at the free surface to deduce an approximate moment-rate tensor. Only in exceptional circumstances will that moment-rate tensor correspond to a double-couple mechanism, a mechanism that can be represented by a scalar moment accumulation rate. More generally, the moment tensor must be resolved into the superposition of two or more double-couple mechanisms, and that resolution can be done in many ways, each with its own scalar moment rate. Thus the resolution is not unique. This is demonstrated by deducing scalar moment accumulation rates for a GPS network that covers most of California south of San Francisco. It is shown that resolutions into different double-couple mechanisms lead to scalar moment accumulation rates differing by factors of ~2. We suggest that the minimum scalar moment rate equivalent to principal surface strain rates {varepsilon}1 and {varepsilon}2 acting over the area A is M0(min) = 2µHA Max (¦{varepsilon}1¦, ¦{varepsilon}2¦, ¦{varepsilon}1 + {varepsilon}2¦), where µ is the rigidity and H the depth of seismogenic zone, and the function Max is equal to the largest of its arguments. Within the uncertainites of measurement, the scalar moment accumulation rate in southern California based on that approximation is in balance with the average historic seismic moment release rate so that no current earthquake deficit need be accumulating.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. Pancha, J. G. Anderson, and C. Kreemer
Comparison of Seismic and Geodetic Scalar Moment Rates across the Basin and Range Province
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 11 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America