Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1998; v. 88; no. 1; p. 140-159
© 1998 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toppozada, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Borchardt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Re-evaluation of the 1836 "Hayward fault" and the 1838 San Andreas fault earthquakes

Tousson R. Toppozada and Glenn Borchardt

California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, 801 K Street, MS 12-31, Sacramento, California 95814-3531

Abstract

Current seismic hazard models include two major earthquakes (M ~ 7) in the San Francisco Bay area that are close in space and time: an 1836 event on the northern Hayward fault and an 1838 event on the peninsula section of the San Andreas fault. Analysis and interpretation of the available historical accounts indicate that the 1836 event occurred east of Monterey Bay, far from the Hayward fault, and was of M ~ 61/4. Also, the 1838 event was not confined to the 60-km peninsula San Andreas as current models indicate. Instead, faulting probably extended from San Francisco to San Juan Bautista (~ 140 km), indicating a significantly larger earthquake (M ~ 71/2) than previously thought.

Damaging effects of the 1836 earthquake were reported only from Santa Clara to Carmel, and no contemporary effects were reported to the north of Santa Clara or near the Hayward fault. The illusion of an "1836 Hayward earthquake" evolved from a newspaper reminiscence published following the 1868 Hayward earthquake, stating that the 1868 effects in the East Bay were similar to those of an 1836 event. The article describes various strong effects in the East Bay that differ completely from the effects recorded for the 1836 earthquake but are very similar to those documented for the major 1838 San Andreas earthquake that caused extensive damage on both sides of San Francisco Bay. Based on this and other evidence, we conclude that the reminiscence describes the destructive June 1838 effects, but it erroneously indicates the date as June 1836. There is no evidence for any major historical earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay area before the 1838 earthquake, back to the founding of Mission San Francisco Dolores in 1776.

During the 1838 San Andreas fault earthquake, the shaking intensity in Monterey was as strong as or stronger than during the great 1906 San Andreas fault earthquake. This suggests that the 1838 San Andreas fault rupture may have extended to San Juan Bautista as it did in 1906. Numerous probable aftershocks were felt in the area south of San Juan Bautista. These damaged Carmel and Santa Cruz in 1840, and Alisal, 16 km west of the San Andreas fault, in 1841. The northern end of the 1838 faulting was previously assumed to be 25 km south of San Francisco. However, Mission San Francisco Dolores was damaged in 1838 but not in 1906, suggesting that the 1838 faulting extended to San Francisco. Also, the 1838 aftershocks were felt in Oakland as frequently and violently as those following the major 1868 Hayward earthquake, suggesting that the 1838 faulting on the San Andreas extended to the latitude of Oakland.

The 1838 fault segment ruptured again 68 years later as part of the overlapping 1906 San Andreas fault rupture. This, and similar evidence from southern California, indicates that M ~ 71/2 San Andreas fault earthquakes can recur at intervals of 68 years or less when they are followed by M ~ 8 earthquakes on overlapping segments of the fault.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field
A Summary of Previous Working Groups on California Earthquake Probabilities
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1033 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Toppozada and D. Branum
San Andreas M ~6 Earthquakes within 40 km of the Priest Valley End Zone of the 1857 Faulting
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S385 - S396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. I. Kelson, A. R. Streig, R. D. Koehler, and K.-H. Kang
Timing of Late Holocene Paleoearthquakes on the Northern San Andreas Fault at the Fort Ross Orchard Site, Sonoma County, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1012 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
Y. Y. Kagan, D. D. Jackson, and Y. Rong
A New Catalog of Southern California Earthquakes, 1800-2005
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2006; 77(1): 30 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Hecker, D. Pantosti, D. P. Schwartz, J. C. Hamilton, L. M. Reidy, and T. J. Powers
The Most Recent Large Earthquake on the Rodgers Creek Fault, San Francisco Bay Area
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2005; 95(3): 844 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Aftershocks and Triggered Events of the Great 1906 California Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 2160 - 2186.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Geologic Setting of the 1884 Bear Lake, Idaho, Earthquake: Rupture in the Hanging Wall of a Basin and Range Normal Fault Revealed by Historical and Geological Analyses
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1621 - 1632.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
An Empirical Model for Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, 2002-2031
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 1 - 13.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
San Andreas Fault Zone, California: M >=5.5 Earthquake History
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2002; 92(7): 2555 - 2601.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Seismicity of South-Central Coastal California: October 1987 through January 1997
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1629 - 1658.



Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Bürgmann, D. Schmidt, R. M. Nadeau, M. d'Alessio, E. Fielding, D. Manaker, T. V. McEvilly, and M. H. Murray
Earthquake Potential Along the Northern Hayward Fault, California
Science, August 18, 2000; 289(5482): 1178 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A Time-Dependent Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Model for California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 1 - 21.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Considering Nonlinear Site Effect
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 66 - 72.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. J. Meltzner and D. J. Wald
Foreshocks and aftershocks of the great 1857 California earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1999; 89(4): 1109 - 1120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. H. Bakun
Seismic activity of the San Francisco Bay region
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1999; 89(3): 764 - 784.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America