Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1998; v. 88; no. 1; p. 89-94
© 1998 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, R.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A new fractal approach to the clustering of earthquakes: Physical fractal

Yong Chen, Ling Chen, Zhaojun Liu and Ru-Shan Wu

State Seismological Bureau, Beijing, P.R. China
Institute of Geophysics State Seismological Bureau, Beijing, P.R. China
Institute of Tectonics University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064

Abstract

Traditional fractal analysis methods of earthquake temporal clustering treat earthquake events as mathematical points (without mass) in time (Smalley et al., 1987). The results obtained by these methods mainly reflect the seismic behavior of numerous small earthquakes. A sieve method of physical fractal analysis has been developed in the present article in which a series of magnitude sieves are used to study the fractal behavior of earthquakes with different magnitudes. Fractal analyses of earthquake clustering are conducted for three regions: northern China, mainland of China, and southern California. We find that all the earthquake subsets of each region show nearly the same fractal dimension, D = 0.3 for northern China and the mainland of China and D = 0.4 for southern California. The scaling ranges in which the corresponding earthquake subsets under consideration exhibit fractal features vary from subset to subset. The method has the potential application to characterizing the fractal behavior of earthquake clustering for different regions.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America