Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1998; v. 88; no. 5; p. 1144-1154
© 1998 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nyffenegger, P.
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Recommendations for determining p values for aftershock sequences and catalogs

Paul Nyffenegger and Cliff Frohlich

Department of Geological Sciences and Institute for Geophysics University of Texas at Austin, 4412 Spicewood Springs, # 600, Austin, Texas, 78759-8500
University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, 4412 Spicewood Springs, # 600, Austin, Texas 78759-8500

Abstract

Using synthetic aftershock sequences, we investigate the factors that influence the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of the Omori-law p value (pMLE) determined for aftershock sequences of individual earthquakes, as well as for "stacked" sequences constructed using aftershocks from two or more mainshock events. The estimated uncertainty in pMLE, called {sigma}MLE, depends explicitly on the aftershock sequence population N, the ratio of the begin and end times of the time interval of interest T/S, and on pMLE itself; this dependence on pMLE leads to over- or underestimating {sigma}MLE. Moreover, {sigma}MLE depends on the aftershock times themselves only as they affect pMLE and is unaffected by whether the sequence decay resembles the Omori decay model. Thus, we recommend that reported p values be accompanied by a goodness-of-fit test, such as the Anderson-Darling statistic Wn2, to assess how well the sequence resembles Omori's law (OL), as well as by values for N, S, and T. Stacking aftershock sequences permits the study of p values for entire catalogs as well as sequences possessing too few events to allow individual analysis. However, stacking sequences with differing begin and end times introduces artifacts into the aftershock time series that need to be avoided when determining p values. One artifact arising at small times after the mainshock mimics the effect of the c parameter in the modified Omori's law (MOL). We can avoid the artifacts by excluding time spans containing changes in the slope of the log rate of aftershock activity from the analysis. For most situations where sequences with varying p, N, and begin and end times are stacked, pMLE is approximately equal to the weighted mean of the individual sequence p values.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America