Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1998; v. 88; no. 5; p. 1155-1170
© 1998 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Making the most of the recordings from short-period seismometer arrays

Alan Douglas

AWE, Bldg. No. BB1, Blacknest, Brimpton, Berkshire RG7 4RS, United Kingdom

Abstract

Several methods have been developed for computing optimum multichannel filters for use with short-period arrays, but these methods are not widely used. The most commonly used method is delay and sum (DS) followed by high-pass filtering. This, however, fails to exploit fully the spatial-filtering properties of arrays, which if used should reduce the need for frequency filtering. To compute spatial filters requires the auto- and cross-correlation of functions of the noise. Here the correlation functions are specified using noise models rather than the observed noise in an interval (the fitting interval) preceding signal onset. With noise models, it is found that problems of signal distortion and "supergain" are avoided, supergain being excessive noise reduction in the fitting interval, with little reduction or even amplification of the noise outside the interval. Using minimum power (MP) filters, which minimize the noise at the output yet pass signals undistorted, it is shown using data from the 20-element array at Eskdalemuir, Scotland, that signal-to-noise improvements of up to 7 can be obtained during periods when noise levels are above average, the improvement with simple delay-and-sum processing for the same noise sample being only 1.7. The use of noise models allows stable and effective wave-number filters to be rapidly estimated and applied. For those seismograms for which the signal and noise after MP processing have obvious differences in predominant frequency, it is shown that optimum frequency filters can sometimes be used to further improve signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) without significant loss of bandwidth.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. D. Koper and B. de Foy
Seasonal Anisotropy in Short-Period Seismic Noise Recorded in South Asia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 3033 - 3045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. D. Selby
Application of a Generalized F Detector at a Seismometer Array
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2469 - 2481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America