Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bhattacharyya, J. Articles by Rundle, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Using a genetic algorithm to model broadband regional waveforms for crustal structure in the western United States

CIRES University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Abstract

In this study, we analyze regional seismograms to obtain the crustal structure in the eastern Great Basin and western Colorado plateau. Adopting a forward-modeling approach, we develop a genetic algorithm (GA) based parameter search technique to constrain the one-dimensional crustal structure in these regions. The data are broadband three-component seismograms recorded at the 1994-95 IRIS PASSCAL Colorado Plateau to Great Basin experiment (CPGB) stations and supplemented by data from U.S. National Seismic Network (USNSN) stations in Utah and Nevada. We use the southwestern Wyoming mine collapse event (M_b = 5.2) that occurred on 3 February 1995 as the seismic source. We model the regional seismograms using a four-layer crustal model with constant layer parameters. Timing of teleseismic receiver functions at CPGB stations are added as an additional constraint in the modeling.

GA allows us to efficiently search the model space. A carefully chosen fitness function and a windowing scheme are added to the algorithm to prevent search stagnation. The technique is tested with synthetic data, both with and without random Gaussian noise added to it. Several separate model searches are carried out to estimate the variability of the model parameters. The average Colorado plateau crustal structure is characterized by a 40-km-thick crust with velocity increases at depths of about 10 and 25 km and a fast lower crust while the Great Basin has approximately 35-km-thick crust and a 2.9-km-thick sedimentary layer.

Footnotes

^* Present address: Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511. E-mail: joydeep@hess.geology.yale.edu.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y.-M. Wu, L. Zhao, C.-H. Chang, and Y.-J. Hsu Focal-Mechanism Determination in Taiwan by Genetic Algorithm Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 651 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Li, A. Michelini, L. Zhu, F. Bernardi, and M. Spada Crustal Velocity Structure in Italy from Analysis of Regional Seismic Waveforms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2024 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-J. Chang and C.-E. Baag Crustal Structure in Southern Korea from Joint Analysis of Regional Broadband Waveforms and Travel Times Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 856 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Validation of the Automatic Nonlinear Source Inversion of the U.S. Geological Survey Intensities of the Whittier Narrows 1987 Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1737 - 1747.

				Source Parameters of Eastern California and Western Nevada Earthquakes from Regional Moment Tensor Inversion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 61 - 84.