Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1999; v. 89; no. 1; p. 36-53
© 1999 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A semi-empirical method for simulating strong ground motions based on variable-slip rupture models for large earthquakes

Kazuo Dan and Toshiaki Sato

Izumi Research Institute Shimizu Corporation, Fukoku-Seimei Building 27F, 2-2-2, Uchisaiwai-Cho, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 100-0011, Japan

Abstract

Variable-slip rupture models for large earthquakes, obtained by the source inversion of long-period (>4 sec) seismic waves, are taken into account in a semi-empirical method for simulating broadband (< about 10 sec) strong ground motions. The high-frequency (>0.25 Hz) source spectrum of the (p, q)th subfault is inferred by the {theta}–2 mode with two circular corner frequencies. The first is {omega}Dpq = Vpq/Dpq, due to the temporal integration of the slip-velocity time function, where Vpq is the maximum slip velocity and Dpq is the final slip. The other is {omega}Spq = 2ßpq/{lambda}pq, due to the spacial integration of the slip-velocity time function on the subfault, where ßpq is the S-wave velocity of the medium and {lambda}pq is the equivalent radius of the subfault. Here, Vpq, Dpq, ßpq, and {lambda}pq are specified by the long-period source-inversion results.

First, we describe this new method by applying it to the variable-slip rupture model for the 1985 Michoacan, Mexico, earthquake of MS 8.1 obtained by Mendoza and Hartzell (1989). The simulated accelerations and velocities at CAL (Caleta de Campos) and VIL (La Villita), both located above the ruptured zone, are in good agreement with the observed ones. Next, the method is applied to the variable-slip rupture model for the 1923 Kanto, Japan, earthquake of MS 8.2 obtained by Wald and Somerville (1995). This earthquake is one of the most important earthquakes for the mitigation of earthquake disaster in the Tokyo metropolitan area; unfortunately, strong-motion records for this earthquake were off-scaled in the region of strong shaking and significant damage. The pseudo-velocity response spectrum of the simulated acceleration of TOK (Tokyo JMA) averages 60 cm/sec in the period range of 0.5 to 10 sec and is consistent with that of the Kanto earthquake record observed at HNG (Hongo, Tokyo), whose off-scaled parts were restored as well as possible by Yokota et al. (1989). The instrumental JMA seismic intensities (JMA, 1996) of the simulated accelerations at TOK and YOK (Yokohama JMA) are consistent with the observed JMA seismic intensity 6 (JMA, 1983). The instrumental JMA seismic intensity of the simulated accelerations at KNS (soil site in Odawara) is also consistent with the JMA seismic intensity 7, estimated from the ratio of collapsed houses (Mononobe, 1925). The simulated broadband (0.1 to 10 sec) motions will be useful in the mitigation of earthquake disaster in the Tokyo metropolitan area.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A Theoretical Omega-Square Model Considering the Spatial Variation in Slip and Rupture Velocity
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2000; 90(2): 387 - 400.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America