Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, G. Articles by Chen, X. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Predictions of the 1997 strong earthquakes in Jiashi, Xinjiang, China

Center for Analysis and Prediction China Seismological Bureau, Beijing 100036, China
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Seismological Bureau, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964 914-365-8828 914-365-8150 xsong{at}ldeo.columbia.edu
China Seismological Bureau, Bejing 100036, China

Abstract

A sequence of strong earthquakes occurred in Jiashi County, Xinjiang, China (40°N, 77°E, population 280,000) in 1997, after a 10-month quiescence following a M_s 6.9 earthquake on 19 March 1996 in the same area. From 21 January 1997, through 18 October 1997, 15 earthquakes occurred with M_s 5.0, seven of which with M_s 6.0. Such sequences of strong earthquakes are rare around the world, but have occurred six times in the land area of China during this century. Of the 15 M_s 5.0 earthquakes in the Jiashi sequence, eight fell within the predicted 7-day time windows of a total of 8 short-term and imminent-stage predictions, but the initial shocks of the sequence (January 21, M_s 6.4, 6.3) were not predicted. Three of the eight predictions made were not fulfilled, one of which was announced to the public (a false alarm). Four of the remaining five predictions were acted on by local authorities and the public was notified 2.5 h to 4 days before the earthquakes, which caused no deaths. One earthquake (April 11, M_s 6.6) struck 30 min after the prediction was made but before action could be taken by the local authorities, and it caused nine deaths. These predictions were based on composite observations of precursory anomalies in seismicity, electromagnetic fields, and crustal deformation, which were in turn compiled over the past 30 years in a nationwide earthquake monitoring program. Examples of precursory anomalies include: (1) a clear seismicity pattern of "quiescence—intensification—main shock(s)" was observed for the April 6 earthquakes (M_s 6.3, 6.4), which was previously applied to the prediction of the well-known 1975 Haicheng earthquake in Laoning, China; (2) distinct decreases in b-values preceded the earthquakes on March 1 (M_s 6.0) and April 6 (M_s 6.3, 6.4); (3) anomalous variation of geomagnetic vertical component preceded the April 6 earthquakes (M_s 6.3, 6.4); (4) sudden decreases in borehole strain preceded 8 of the earthquakes.

Footnotes

^* Present address: Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Xu, S. W. Roecker, R. Wei, W. Zhang, and B. Wei Analysis of Seismic Activity in the Crust from Earthquake Relocation in the Central Tien Shan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 737 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-M. Wu and L.-Y. Chiao Seismic Quiescence before the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Mw 7.6 Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 321 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Howell Jr. A Simple Test for the Imminence of a Large Earthquake in Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1482 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]