Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1999; v. 89; no. 5; p. 1313-1322
© 1999 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiemer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Duenkel, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evidence for shear-wave anisotropy in the mantle wedge beneath south central Alaska

Stefan Wiemer*, Guy Tytgat, Max Wyss and Uwe Duenkel

Seismology and Volcanology Department Meteorological Research Institute, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba 305, Japan stefan{at}mri-jma.go.jp
Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-7320

Abstract

We investigate shear-wave polarization and splitting for more than 200 earthquakes with hypocentral depths ranging from 20 to 180 km beneath southcentral Alaska. Data were recorded at three sites (stations SKN, AUI, and RED). A preferred polarization parallel to the strike of the Wadati-Benioff Zone (WBZ) (N25°E) is found for a majority of events. However, some regions show systematic differences in polarization. For a subset of nine events, we compute focal mechanisms and find no correlation between the theoretical shear-wave polarization caused by the fault-plane orientation and the observed polarization. Delays of the slow versus the fast S-wave range from less than 0.05 to 0.25 sec for station SKN, and up to 0.4 sec for stations AUI and RED. A statistically significant correlation of delay with depth is found (r = 0.78), with the largest delays corresponding to the deepest events. This indicates that the source of the anisotropy cannot be located in the crust. Based on the ray path geometry, the source cannot be solely located in the subducting slab either and must therefore originate in the mantle wedge. Our results for the subduction zone beneath Alaska are consistent with similar studies in other subduction zones that describe slab-parallel anisotropy in the mantle wedge.

Footnotes

* Present address: Institute of Geophysics; ETH Hoenggerberg; CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland; +41-1-6336625; E-mail: stefan@seismo.ifg.ethz.ch




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Park and V. Levin
Seismic Anisotropy: Tracing Plate Dynamics in the Mantle
Science, April 19, 2002; 296(5567): 485 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America