|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Article |
Department of Earth Sciences
Carleton University
1125 Colonel By Drive
Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
E-mail gma{at}ccs.carleton.ca
(G. M. A.)
Pacific Engineering and Analysis
311 Pomona Ave.
El Cerrito, California 94530
(W. S.)
Manuscript received 28 April 1999.
Ground-motion relations are developed for California using a stochastic simulation method that exploits the equivalence between finite-fault models and a two-corner point-source model of the earthquake spectrum. First, stochastic simulations are generated for finite-fault ruptures, in order to define the average shape and amplitude level of the radiated spectrum at near-source distances as a function of earthquake size. The length and width of the fault plane are defined based on the moment magnitude of the earthquake and modeled with an array of subfaults. The radiation from each subfault is modeled as a Brune point source using the stochastic model approach; the subfault spectrum has a single-corner frequency. An earthquake rupture initiates at a randomly chosen subfault (hypocenter), and propagates in all directions along the fault plane. A subfault is triggered when rupture propagation reaches its center. Simulations are generated for an observation point by summing the subfault time series, appropriately lagged in time. Fourier spectra are computed for records simulated at many azimuths, placed at equidistant observation points around the fault. The mean Fourier spectrum for each magnitude, at a reference near-source distance, is used to define the shape and amplitude levels of an equivalent point-source spectrum that mimics the salient finite-fault effects. The functional form for the equivalent point-source spectrum contains two corner frequencies.
Stochastic point-source simulations, using the derived two-corner source spectrum, are then performed to predict peak-ground-motion parameters and response spectra for a wide range of magnitudes and distances, for generic California sites. The stochastic ground-motion relations, given in the Appendix for rock and soil sites, are in good agreement with the empirical strong-motion database for California; the average ratio of observed to simulated amplitudes is near unity over all frequencies from 0.2 to 12 Hz. The stochastic relations agree well with empirical regression equations (e.g., Abrahamson and Silva, 1997; Boore et al., 1997; Sadigh et al., 1997) in the magnitude-distance ranges well represented by the data, but are better constrained at large distances, due to the use of attenuation parameters based on regional seismographic data. The stochastic ground-motion relations provide a sound basis for estimation of ground motions for earthquakes of magnitude 4 through 8, at distances from 1 to 200 km.
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Akkar and E. Yenier Assessment of Point-Source Stochastic Simulations Using Recently Derived Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3172 - 3191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Atkinson, K. Assatourians, D. M. Boore, K. Campbell, and D. Motazedian A Guide to Differences between Stochastic Point-Source and Stochastic Finite-Fault Simulations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3192 - 3201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Kuehn, F. Scherbaum, and C. Riggelsen Deriving Empirical Ground-Motion Models: Balancing Data Constraints and Physical Assumptions to Optimize Prediction Capability Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2335 - 2347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Atkinson and M. Macias Predicted Ground Motions for Great Interface Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1552 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Macias, G. M. Atkinson, and D. Motazedian Ground-Motion Attenuation, Source, and Site Effects for the 26 September 2003 M 8.1 Tokachi-Oki Earthquake Sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1947 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Campbell Comment on "Empirical-Stochastic Ground-Motion Prediction for Eastern North America" by Behrooz Tavakoli and Shahram Pezeshk Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 2094 - 2097. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tavakoli and S. Pezeshk Reply to "Comment on 'Empirical-Stochastic Ground-Motion Prediction for Eastern North America' by Behrooz Tavakoli and Shahram Pezeshk" by Kenneth W. Campbell Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 2098 - 2100. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Malagnini, K. Mayeda, R. Uhrhammer, A. Akinci, and R. B. Herrmann A Regional Ground-Motion Excitation/Attenuation Model for the San Francisco Region Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 843 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shoja-Taheri, S. Naserieh, and H. Ghofrani ML and MW Scales in the Iranian Plateau Based on the Strong-Motion Records Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 661 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Atkinson and D. M. Boore Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2181 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Scherbaum, F. Cotton, and H. Staedtke The Estimation of Minimum-Misfit Stochastic Models from Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 427 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tavakoli and S. Pezeshk Empirical-Stochastic Ground-Motion Prediction for Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2283 - 2296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sokolov, K.-P. Bonjer, M. Oncescu, and M. Rizescu Hard Rock Spectral Models for Intermediate-Depth Vrancea, Romania, Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1749 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Halldorsson and A. S. Papageorgiou Calibration of the Specific Barrier Model to Earthquakes of Different Tectonic Regions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1276 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Motazedian and G. M. Atkinson Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling Based on a Dynamic Corner Frequency Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2005; 95(3): 995 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pacor, G. Cultrera, A. Mendez, and M. Cocco Finite Fault Modeling of Strong Ground Motions Using a Hybrid Deterministic-Stochastic Approach Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2005; 95(1): 225 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Empirical Corrections for Basin Effects in Stochastic Ground-Motion Prediction, Based on the Los Angeles Basin Analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1679 - 1690. |
||||
![]() |
Empirical Ground-Motion Relations for Subduction-Zone Earthquakes and Their Application to Cascadia and Other Regions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1703 - 1729. |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Campbell Prediction of Strong Ground Motion Using the Hybrid Empirical Method and Its Use in the Development of Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations in Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1012 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Instrumental Intensity Distribution for the Hector Mine, California, and the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquakes: Comparison of Two Methods Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2145 - 2162. |
||||
![]() |
Comparison of the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake Strong-Motion Data and Ground-Motion Assessment Based on Spectral Model from Smaller Earthquakes in Taiwan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1855 - 1877. |
||||
![]() |
Global Comparisons of Earthquake Source Spectra Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 885 - 895. |
||||
![]() |
Source Parameters of Earthquakes in Eastern and Western North America Based on Finite-Fault Modeling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 695 - 710. |
||||
![]() |
Reply to Comment by R. A. W. Haddon on "Evaluation of Models for Earthquake Source Spectra in Eastern North America" by Gail M. Atkinson and David M. Boore Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2000; 90(5): 1339 - 1341. |
||||
![]() |
Integrated Use of Seismograph and Strong-Motion Data to Determine Soil Amplification: Response of the Fraser River Delta to the Duvall and Georgia Strait Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2000; 90(4): 1028 - 1040. |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |