Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2000; v. 90; no. 3; p. 709-723; DOI: 10.1785/0119990142
© 2000 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Lithological Controls on Seismicity in Granitic Rocks

David S. Collins and R. Paul Young

Applied Seismology Consultants Ltd.
10 Belmont
Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 1TE
England
(D. S. C.)

University of Liverpool, Department of Earth Sciences
Jane Herdman Laboratories
Brownlow Street
Liverpool, L69 3BX
England
(R. P. Y.)

Seismicity induced from a tunnel excavation through two lithological units, granite and granodiorite, at the Canadian Underground Research Laboratory (URL) is analyzed in an attempt to understand observed lithological differences in the damage-zone development. The results from seismicity recorded by the 16 triaxial accelerometer array found the damage zone around granite excavations to have more events occurring ahead of the tunnel face and a shorter overall seismic response time than the granodiorite. Petrographic analysis of the rock samples show stress relief microcracking predominantly in the larger quartz crystals, suggesting that these are the weakest mineral grains. We propose that initial in situ cracking occurs in the large quartz crystals, significantly reducing the strength and resulting in rapid formation of the excavation damage zone. The smaller-grained, more homogenous granodiorite shows less stress relief microcracking, probably due to the stresses being distributed over a larger number of grain boundaries. From the seismic and petrographic evidence we propose that the crack initiation stress is lower in the granite than the granodiorite.

The events from the granite and granodiorite have a similar range in magnitude (Mw = –2.9 to –4.2) and source dimension (r0 = 0.13–0.51 m). They have a mean P- to S-wave corner frequency ratio of 1.0, probably indicating relatively slow rupture velocities. About 25% of the events have an S- to P-wave energy ratio less than 10, agreeing with previous source mechanism studies, which find a number of events at this depth have significant isotropic components.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America