Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2000; v. 90; no. 5; p. 1174-1187; DOI: 10.1785/0119990158
© 2000 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyss, M.
Right arrow Articles by Toya, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Is Background Seismicity Produced at a Stationary Poissonian Rate?

Max Wyss and Yuzo Toya

Geophysical Institute
University of Alaska
Fairbanks, Alaska 99775
max{at}giseis.alaska.edu

We tested the hypothesis that, on the scale of a decade, earthquakes deeper than 60 km are produced at an approximately constant, that is, stationary Poissonian rate. We selected earthquakes with depths greater than 60 km to avoid the ubiquitous clusters present in shallow seismicity, without declustering the data set. Six of the 90 randomly positioned volumes contained obvious aftershock sequences and, thus, were excluded from the scoring. We showed that magnitude shifts of 0.2 to 0.4 units are present in some catalogs. Since we measure the seismicity rate above a minimum magnitude, these shifts introduce artificial fluctuations in the rate. Therefore, we modeled the influence of the magnitude shifts on the test. Measuring the goodness of fit to a stationary Poisson process model by the {chi}2-test for samples of 500 earthquakes each, we found that the hypothesis cannot be rejected at the 95% confidence levels based on the data in the 84 volumes without obvious aftershock sequences. We propose that this constancy of production rate is due to the effect of a constant loading rate by tectonic plate motion on an asperity assembly with a uniform distribution of current loading stress. Although this result cannot be obtained for shallow seismicity because of the presence of numerous clusters, it seems reasonable to assume that the shallow background seismicity is also produced at a stationary Poissonian rate.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Suckale and G. Grunthal
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Model for Vanuatu
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2108 - 2126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Wyss and R. Stefansson
Nucleation Points of Recent Mainshocks in Southern Iceland, Mapped by b-Values
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 599 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America