Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2000; v. 90; no. 6; p. 1384-1390; DOI: 10.1785/0120000026
© 2000 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Comparison of Manual and Automatic Onset Time Picking

M. Leonard

Australian Geological Survey Organisation
GPO Box 378
Canberra ACT 2600, Australia

The onset times for 78 teleseismic iP phases are picked by four seismic analysts and by three automatic picking algorithms, on both the single trace and on an array beam. The difference in the onset times picked by different analysts is on average ±0.067 sec with a standard deviation of 0.15 sec. The analysts on average pick times 0.1 sec earlier on the beam than on the single trace.

The three automatic pickers are the picker described by Earle and Shearer (1994), an autoregressive–Akaike information criteria (AR-AIC) picker (Leonard and Kennett, 1999) and an adjusted AR-AIC picker, which is described in this article. Of the three automatic pickers, the adjusted AR-AIC picker picks onset times closest to an experienced analyst. Compared to the three most experienced analysts, the difference in onset time is on average ± 0.043 sec, with a standard deviation of 0.19 sec. These values are very similar to the differences between the analysts, suggesting that for many applications, the time estimated by the adjusted AR-AIC picker can be used without review by a seismic analyst.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Zeiler and A. A. Velasco
Seismogram Picking Error from Analyst Review (SPEAR): Single-Analyst and Institution Analysis
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2759 - 2770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. W. Hildyard, S. E. J. Nippress, and A. Rietbrock
Event Detection and Phase Picking Using a Time-Domain Estimate of Predominate Period Tpd
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 3025 - 3032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ENVIRON ENG GEOPHYSHome page
J. Tronicke
The Influence of High Frequency Uncorrelated Noise on First-Break Arrival Times and Crosshole Traveltime Tomography
Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, June 1, 2007; 12(2): 173 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Automatic P-Wave Arrival Detection and Picking with Multiscale Wavelet Analysis for Single-Component Recordings
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 1904 - 1912.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America