Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2001; v. 91; no. 1; p. 13-26; DOI: 10.1785/0120000007
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harmsen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Geographic Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard in the United States

Stephen Harmsen and Arthur Frankel

U.S. Geological Survey
Denver, Colorado, 80225

The seismic hazard calculations for the 1996 national seismic hazard maps have been geographically deaggregated to assist in the understanding of the relative contributions of sources. These deaggregations are exhibited as maps with vertical bars whose heights are proportional to the contribution that each geographical cell makes to the ground-motion exceedance hazard. Bar colors correspond to average source magnitudes. We also extend the deaggregation analysis reported in Harmsen et al. (1999) to the western conterminous United States. In contrast to the central and eastern United States (CEUS); the influence of specific faults or characteristic events can be clearly identified.

Geographic deaggregation for 0.2-sec and 1.0-sec pseudo spectral acceleration (SA) is performed for 10% probability of exceedance (PE) in 50 yr (475-yr mean return period) and 2% PE in 50 yr (2475-yr mean return period) for four western U.S. cities, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, and Seattle, and for three central and eastern U.S. cities, Atlanta, Boston, and Saint Louis. In general, as the PE is lowered, the sources of hazard closer to the site dominate. Larger, more distant earthquakes contribute more significantly to hazard for 1.0-sec SA than for 0.2-sec SA. Additional maps of geographically deaggregated seismic hazard are available on the Internet for 120 cities in the conterminous United States (http://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/eq/) for 1-sec SA and for 0.2-sec SA with a 2% PE in 50 yr.

Examination of these maps of hazard contributions enables the investigator to determine the distance and azimuth to predominant sources, and their magnitudes. This information can be used to generate scenario earthquakes and corresponding time histories for seismic design and retrofit. Where fault density is lower than deaggregation cell dimensions, we can identify specific faults that contribute significantly to the seismic hazard at a given site. Detailed fault information enables investigators to include rupture information such as source directivity, radiation pattern, and basin-edge effects into their scenario earthquakes used in engineering analyses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Barani, D. Spallarossa, and P. Bazzurro
Disaggregation of Probabilistic Ground-Motion Hazard in Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2638 - 2661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
V. Convertito, I. Iervolino, and A. Herrero
Importance of Mapping Design Earthquakes: Insights for the Southern Apennines, Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2979 - 2991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. K. Malhotra
Seismic Design Loads from Site-Specific and Aggregate Hazard Analyses
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1849 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Pagani and A. Marcellini
Seismic-Hazard Disaggregation: A Fully Probabilistic Methodology
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1688 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Marin, J.-P. Avouac, M. Nicolas, and A. Schlupp
A Probabilistic Approach to Seismic Hazard in Metropolitan France
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2137 - 2163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Deaggregation in Magnitude, Distance, and Azimuth in the South and West of the Iberian Peninsula
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2177 - 2185.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Mean and Modal {epsilon} in the Deaggregation of Probabilistic Ground Motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1537 - 1552.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America