Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2001; v. 91; no. 3; p. 427-440; DOI: 10.1785/0120000248
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilley, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Inferring Segment Strength Contrasts and Boundaries along Low-Friction Faults Using Surface Offset Data, with an Example from the Cholame-Carrizo Segment Boundary along the San Andreas Fault, Southern California

George E. Hilley, J Ramón Arrowsmith and Elizabeth Stone

Active Tectonics Research Group
Department of Geology
Arizona State University
(G.H., J R.A., E.S.)

Rupture segmentation arises from changes in fault geometry and strength. We use boundary element models of frictionless strike-slip fault segments to quantify how fault geometry and strength change earthquake surface offset distributions. Using these relationships between fault geometry, strength, and surface offsets, we can infer fault strength from the surface offsets in cases where the fault geometry can be independently constrained. This article includes normalized plots of the surface offset distribution expected from rupture along low-friction fault segments with strength contrasts of 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 1, 2, 3, and 4 for a range of fault segment geometries. These plots may be used with offset data to constrain the strength of two coplanar, adjacent fault segments. This analysis is applied to the Cholame and Carrizo segments of the San Andreas Fault. The available surface offset data suggest that the offset increases where the fault deepens; in addition, the observed offset gradient at the segment boundary requires a 2/3–1/4 strength ratio of the Cholame to the Carrizo segment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. E. Hilley and J. J. Young
Deducing Paleoearthquake Timing and Recurrence from Paleoseismic Data, Part I: Evaluation of New Bayesian Markov-Chain Monte Carlo Simulation Methods Applied to Excavations with Continuous Peat Growth
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 383 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Displacement across the Cholame Segment of the San Andreas Fault between 1855 and 1893 from Cadastral Surveys
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2002; 92(7): 2659 - 2669.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Three-Dimensional Excavation and Recent Rupture History along the Cholame Segment of the San Andreas Fault
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2002; 92(7): 2670 - 2688.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America