Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2001; v. 91; no. 3; p. 538-552; DOI: 10.1785/0119990128
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuncay, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ortoleva, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Failure, Memory, and Cyclic Fault Movement

Kagan Tuncay, A. Khalil and Peter J. Ortoleva

Laboratory for Computational Geodynamics
Chemistry Building
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana, 47405
ktuncay{at}indiana.edu
ortoleva{at}indiana.edu

Faulting is typically a two timescale process, that is, rapid failure and slow (chemical) healing. Once failed, a rock has a long memory until slow chemical processes have time to re-establish the grain–grain contacts underlying rock competency. The memory of rock failure can be captured by a sufficiently rich textural model, and the texture must be coevolved with rock stress and deformation to yield a self-consistent model of strain hardening/weakening, fault narrowing, and earthquake cyclicity.

A model based on incremental stress rheology and rock texture dynamics is introduced that emphasizes the interplay of rock competency, porosity, and other texture variables with stress and strain. The deformation mechanisms taken into consideration are poroelasticity and viscosity. The rheology equations are strongly coupled to the evolution equations of rock texture and pore fluid flow.

The model is used to gain an understanding of several oscillatory modes of fault movement. The roles of rock competency, fluid pressure, and continuous deformation in these oscillations is illustrated for various conditions. The approach is shown to be a natural starting point for a theory of the three-dimensional, multiprocess dynamics of fault nucleation, growth, morphology, reactivation, and continuous versus seismic behavior.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
K. Tuncay, A. Park, D. Payne, and P. Ortoleva
3D fracture network dynamics in reservoirs, faults and salt tectonic systems
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 209(1): 155 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America