Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2001; v. 91; no. 3; p. 594-603; DOI: 10.1785/0120000238
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Improving Global Seismic Event Locations Using Source-Receiver Reciprocity

Peter M. Shearer

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California 92093-0225
pshearer{at}ucsd.edu
(P.M.S.)

The leading source of error in seismic event locations is travel-time perturbations caused by three-dimensional Earth structure. The reciprocity of travel times between sources and receivers provides a method for testing the effectiveness of empirical methods for improving event locations that rely on nearby calibration events of known location. We apply this approach to travel-time residuals obtained by Engdahl et al. (1998) for almost 100,000 teleseismic events. By analyzing the residual patterns at thousands of seismic stations of known location, we characterize the spatial coherence of station/event mislocation vectors. We find that, on average, calibration events are likely to improve locations only if they are located within 100–150 km of the target events. For 84 events of known location, we find that applying source-receiver reciprocity can significantly reduce location errors by correcting for the teleseismic residual pattern observed at stations close to the target events. These results have implications for efforts to improve event locations for nuclear explosion monitoring purposes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Woodgold
Comment on "Three Theorems of Earthquake Location" by Cinna Lomnitz
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 504 - 505.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America