Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dolan, J. F. Articles by Rockwell, T. K. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Paleoseismologic Evidence for a Very Large (M_w >7), Post-A.D. 1660 Surface Rupture on the Eastern San Cayetano Fault, Ventura County, California: Was This the Elusive Source of the Damaging 21 December 1812 Earthquake?

Department of Earth Sciences
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California 90089-0740
dolan{at}earth.usc.edu
(J.F.D.)

Department of Geology
San Diego State University
San Diego, California 92182
trockwell{at}geology.sdsu.edu
(T.K.R.)

The first paleoseismologic data from the San Cayetano fault, a major reverse fault that extends along the northern edge of the Ventura Basin northwest of Los Angeles, reveal that the most recent event on the eastern part of the fault generated at least 4.3 m of surface slip. Age determinations from detrital charcoal recovered from the faulted section indicate that this surface rupture occurred after A.D. 1660; the faulted deposits are overlain by unfaulted historical alluvium containing abundant metal fragments and a leather glove. Comparison of the large surface slip in this event with data from other earthquakes indicates that the most recent eastern San Cayetano surface rupture was larger than M_w 7 and was probably of the order of magnitude 7.5—much larger than any earthquakes that have occurred on Los Angeles metropolitan region faults during the past 150 yr. Such a large event almost certainly would have been recorded had it occurred during the historical period, even if it had occurred during the earliest part of the historical era between ca. A.D. 1780 and 1850. Although this surface rupture could have occurred during the century immediately preceding the historic era, the location and large size of the event lead us to suggest that the trench exposed evidence for the damaging earthquake of 21 December 1812. Whether the most recent surface rupture on the eastern San Cayetano fault was the 21 December 1812 event, these paleoseismologic data add to a growing body of evidence that shows that large earthquakes have occurred on faults within and adjacent to the Los Angeles metropolitan region, reemphasizing the need to include such large events on urban faults in future seismic hazard analyses of the region.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. T. Marshall, M. L. Cooke, and S. E. Owen Effects of Nonplanar Fault Topology and Mechanical Interaction on Fault-Slip Distributions in the Ventura Basin, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1113 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Nicholson, M. J. Kamerling, C. C. Sorlien, T. E. Hopps, and J.-P. Gratier Subsidence, Compaction, and Gravity Sliding: Implications for 3D Geometry, Dynamic Rupture, and Seismic Hazard of Active Basin- Bounding Faults in Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1607 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Levi, J. Nabelek, and R. S. Yeats Paleomagnetism-based limits on earthquake magnitudes in northwestern metropolitan Los Angeles, California, USA Geology, May 1, 2005; 33(5): 401 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				San Andreas Fault Zone, California: M >=5.5 Earthquake History Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2002; 92(7): 2555 - 2601.