Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2001; v. 91; no. 6; p. 1619-1628; DOI: 10.1785/0119990116
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zobin, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levina, V. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

The Rupture Process of the Mw 7.8 Cape Kronotsky, Kamchatka, Earthquake of 5 December 1997 and Its Relationship to Foreshocks and Aftershocks

Vyacheslav M. Zobin and Valeria I. Levina

Observatorio Vulcanologico
Universidad de Colima
Colima, Col. 28045, México
vzobin{at}cgic.ucol.mx
(V.M.Z.)

Kamchatka Experimental and Methodological Department
Geophysical Service, Russian Academy of Sciences
9 Piip Av., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii, 683006, Russia
valeria{at}emsd.iks.ru
(V.I.L.)

A Mw 7.8 shallow subduction earthquake occurred on 5 December 1997 near Cape Kronotsky, Kamchatka Peninsula. Broadband P-wave inversions, carried out using two independent methods, allowed us to locate the position of the main asperities, one of high slip of up to 240 cm and a pair of lower slip, that ruptured during the mainshock. The mainshock hypocenter was located within the first asperity but not in the region of maximum slip. Most of the aftershock activity occurred within the low-slip asperities zone; the higher-slip asperity was characterized by low aftershock activity. All large aftershocks as well as the foreshocks (Mw ≥5.5) occurred outside of the asperities. The mainshock was preceded by a long-term series of single moderate-size events. Based on the spatial distribution of preceding events, foreshocks, aftershocks, and two main asperity zones broken during the mainshock, the following fault history of the Mw 7.8 earthquake is proposed. There was an asperity zone below the Kronotsky Cape and its submarine continuation. This asperity was the site of concentration of the events preceding the mainshock, the single earthquakes of magnitude mb between 5.5 and 6.1 that occurred during the 35 years before the mainshock of 5 December 1997. The Mw 5.8 earthquake of 9 February 1997, which was accompanied by aftershocks, finished this sequence of single events and marked a change in stress regime within the zone. A foreshock series occurred within the aftershock area of the 9 February earthquake, preparing the nucleus of rupture for the Mw 7.8 event, which began at the periphery of the Kronotsky asperity and then broke it almost completely. The rupture continued its way to the southwestern asperities. However, the southwestern asperities were only partially broken, with the amplitude of slip half that for the first asperity. As a result, during the aftershock stage, the maximum activity occurred around these asperity zones. The region of the first asperity, which was completely broken by the mainshock rupture, had almost no aftershock activity.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America