Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2002; v. 92; no. 1; p. 138-160; DOI: 10.1785/0120000830
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (46)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feigl, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Reilinger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Estimating Slip Distribution for the Izmit Mainshock from Coseismic GPS, ERS-1, RADARSAT, and SPOT Measurements

Kurt L. Feigl, Francesco Sarti, Hélène Vadon, Simon McClusky, Semih Ergintav, Philippe Durand, Roland Bürgmann, Alexis Rigo, Didier Massonnet and Rob Reilinger

Department of Terrestrial and Planetary Dynamics (UMR 5562)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
14 ave. E. Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
Kurt.Feigl{at}cnes.fr
(K.L.F., A.R.)
Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)
18 ave. E. Belin, 31401 Toulouse, France
Francesco, Sarti{at}cnes.fr
Helene.Vadon{at}cnes.fr
Philippe.Durand{at}cnes.fr
Didier.Massonet{at}cnes.fr

(F.S., H.V., P.D., D.M.)
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
E34, 42 Carleton Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02142
simon{at}wegener.mit.edu, reilinge{at}erl.mit.edu
(S.M., R.R.)
TUBITAK, Marmara Research Center, ESRI,
Gebze 41470, Turkey
semih{at}yunus.mam.gov.tr
(S.E.)
Department of Earth and Planetary Science
307 McCone Hall, University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, California, 94720
burgmann{at}seismo.berkeley.edu
(R.B.)

Manuscript received 15 September 2000.

We use four geodetic satellite systems (Global Positioning System [GPS], European Remote Sensing [ERS], RADARSAT, and Satellite Pour l'Observation de la Terre [SPOT]) to measure the permanent deformation field produced by the Izmit earthquake of 17 August 1999. We emphasize measurements from interferometric analysis of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images acquired by ERS and RADARSAT and their geodetic uncertainties. The primary seismological use of these data is to determine earthquake source parameters, such as the distribution of slip and the fault geometry. After accounting for one month's postseismic deformation, tropospheric delay, and orbital gradients, we use these data to estimate the distribution of slip at the time of the Izmit mainshock. The different data sets resolve different aspects of the distribution of slip at depth. Although these estimates agree to first order with those derived from surface faulting, teleseismic recordings, and strong motion, careful comparison reveals differences of 40% in seismic moment. We assume smooth parameterization for the fault geometry and a standard elastic dislocation model. The root mean square residual scatter is 25 mm and 11 mm for the ERS and RADARSAT range changes, respectively. Our estimate of the moment from a joint inversion of the four geodetic data sets is M0 = 1.84 x 1020 N m, a moment magnitude of Mw 7.50. These values are lower than other estimates using more realistic layered earth models. Given the differences between the various models, we conclude that the real errors in the estimated slip distributions are at the level of 1 m. The prudent geophysical conclusion is that coseismic slip during the Izmit earthquake tapers gradually from approximately 2 m under the Hersek delta to 1 m at a point 10 km west of it. We infer that the Yalova segment west of the Hersek delta may remain capable of significant slip in a future earthquake.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeosphereHome page
C. G. Schiek and J. M. Hurtado Jr
Slip analysis of the Kokoxili earthquake using terrain-change detection and regional earthquake data
Geosphere, May 1, 2006; 2(3): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. R. Muller, A. Aydin, and T. J. Wright
Using an elastic dislocation model to investigate static Coulomb stress change scenarios for earthquake ruptures in the eastern Marmara Sea region, Turkey
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 253(1): 397 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Hearn and R. Burgmann
The Effect of Elastic Layering on Inversions of GPS Data for Coseismic Slip and Resulting Stress Changes: Strike-Slip Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1637 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou
A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1099 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Dynamics of Izmit Earthquake Postseismic Deformation and Loading of the Duzce Earthquake Hypocenter
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 172 - 193.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Joint Inversion of InSAR, GPS, Teleseismic, and Strong-Motion Data for the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Earthquake Slip: Application to the 1999 Izmit Mainshock
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 278 - 299.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America