Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2002; v. 92; no. 6; p. 2061-2079; DOI: 10.1785/0120010260
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hough, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

The 26 January 2001 M 7.6 Bhuj, India, Earthquake: Observed and Predicted Ground Motions

Susan E. Hough, Stacey Martin, Roger Bilham and Gail M. Atkinson

U.S. Geological Survey
525 S. Wilson Ave.
Pasadena, California 91106
(S.E.H.)

Fergusson College
Pune 411 004
Maharashtra, India
(S.M.)

Department of Geoogical Sciences
2200 Colorado Avenue
University of Colorado
Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399
(R.B.)

Carleton University
Department of Earth Sciences
Ottawa, Canada
(G.M.A.)

Although local and regional instrumental recordings of the devastating 26, January 2001, Bhuj earthquake are sparse, the distribution of macroseismic effects can provide important constraints on the mainshock ground motions. We compiled available news accounts describing damage and other effects and interpreted them to obtain modified Mercalli intensities (MMIs) at >200 locations throughout the Indian subcontinent. These values are then used to map the intensity distribution throughout the subcontinent using a simple mathematical interpolation method. Although preliminary, the maps reveal several interesting features. Within the Kachchh region, the most heavily damaged villages are concentrated toward the western edge of the inferred fault, consistent with western directivity. Significant sediment-induced amplification is also suggested at a number of locations around the Gulf of Kachchh to the south of the epicenter. Away from the Kachchh region, intensities were clearly amplified significantly in areas that are along rivers, within deltas, or on coastal alluvium, such as mudflats and salt pans. In addition, we use fault-rupture parameters inferred from teleseismic data to predict shaking intensity at distances of 0–1000 km. We then convert the predicted hard-rock ground-motion parameters to MMI by using a relationship (derived from Internet-based intensity surveys) that assigns MMI based on the average effects in a region. The predicted MMIs are typically lower by 1–3 units than those estimated from news accounts, although they do predict near-field ground motions of approximately 80%g and potentially damaging ground motions on hard-rock sites to distances of approximately 300 km. For the most part, this discrepancy is consistent with the expected effect of sediment response, but it could also reflect other factors, such as unusually high building vulnerability in the Bhuj region and a tendency for media accounts to focus on the most dramatic damage, rather than the average effects. The discrepancy may also be partly attributable to the inadequacy of the empirical relationship between MMI and peak ground acceleration (PGA), when applied to India. The MMI–PGA relationship was developed using data from California earthquakes, which might have a systematically different stress drop and therefore, a different frequency content than intraplate events. When a relationship between response spectra and MMI is used, we obtain larger predicted MMI values, in better agreement with the observations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Padhy
Characteristics of Body-Wave Attenuations in the Bhuj Crust
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3300 - 3313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. Mandal, U. Dutta, and R. K. Chadha
Estimation of Site Response in the Kachchh Seismic Zone, Gujarat, India
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2559 - 2566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
Q. Miao and C. A. Langston
Comparative Study of Distance Attenuation in the Central United States and Western India
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2008; 79(3): 446 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
R. Bilham, S. Lodi, S. Hough, S. Bukhary, A. M. Khan, and S. F. A. Rafeeqi
Seismic Hazard in Karachi, Pakistan: Uncertain Past, Uncertain Future
Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2007; 78(6): 601 - 613.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. E. Hough and P. Pande
Quantifying the Media Bias in Intensity Surveys: Lessons from the 2001 Bhuj, India, Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 638 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Padhy, U. Wegler, and M. Korn
Seismogram Envelope Inversion Using a Multiple Isotropic Scattering Model: Application to Aftershocks of the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 222 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. R. Castro and E. Ruiz-Cruz
Stochastic Modeling of the 30 September 1999 Mw 7.5 Earthquake, Oaxaca, Mexico
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2259 - 2271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. S. Martin
Intensity Distribution from the 2004 M 9.0 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2005; 76(3): 321 - 330.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. E. Hough, R. Bilham, K. Mueller, W. Stephenson, R. Williams, and J. Odum
Wagon Loads of Sand Blows in White County, Illinois
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2005; 76(3): 373 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Ground-Motion Scaling in the Kachchh Basin, India, Deduced from Aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1658 - 1669.



Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
A. Frankel
How Can Seismic Hazard around the New Madrid Seismic Zone Be Similar to That in California?
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2004; 75(5): 575 - 586.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A Source Study of the Bhuj, India, Earthquake of 26 January 2001 (Mw 7.6)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2004; 94(4): 1195 - 1206.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Parameters and Tectonic Implications of Aftershocks of the Mw 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake of 26 January 2001
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 818 - 827.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling of Ground Motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Application to Rock and Soil Sites with Implications for Nonlinear Site Response
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1691 - 1702.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Site-Specific Seismic-Hazard Analysis that is Completely Probabilistic
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1841 - 1846.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Antolik and D. S. Dreger
Rupture Process of the 26 January 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj, India, Earthquake from Teleseismic Broadband Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1235 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Reevaluated Intensities for the Great Assam Earthquake of 12 June 1897, Shillong, India
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 655 - 673.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America