|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Article |
U.S. Geological Survey
MS 966, Box 25046, DFC
Denver,
Colorado 80225
We used recordings of the M 6.8 Nisqually earthquake and its ML 3.4 aftershock to study site response and basin effects for 35 locations in Seattle, Washington. We determined site amplification from Fourier spectral ratios of the recorded horizontal ground motions, referenced to a soft-rock site. Soft-soil sites (generally National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program [NEHRP] class E) on artificial fill and young alluvium have the largest 1-Hz amplifications (factors of 3–7) for both the mainshock and aftershock. These amplifications are correlated with areas of higher damage from the mainshock to major buildings and liquefaction. There are several indications of nonlinear response at the soft-soil sites for the mainshock ground motions, despite relatively modest peak accelerations in the S waves of 15%–22%g. First, the mainshock spectral ratios do not show amplification at 2–8 Hz as do the aftershock spectral ratios. Spectral peaks at frequencies below 2 Hz generally occur at lower frequencies for the mainshock spectral ratios than for the aftershock ratios. At one soft-soil site, there is a clear shift of the resonant frequency to a lower frequency for the mainshock compared with the aftershock. The frequency of this resonance increases in the coda of the mainshock record, indicating that the site response during the weaker motions of the coda is more linear than that of the initial S wave. Three of the soft-soil sites display cusped, one-sided mainshock accelerograms after the S wave. These soft-soil sites also show amplification at 10–20 Hz in the S wave, relative to the rock site, that is not observed for the aftershock. The cusped waveforms and 10–20-Hz amplification are symptomatic of nonlinear response at the soft-soil sites. These sites had nearby liquefaction. The largest amplifications for 0.5 Hz occur at soft-soil sites on the southern portion of the Seattle Basin. Stiff-soil sites (NEHRP classes D and C) on Pleistocence-age glacial deposits display similar spectral amplification for the mainshock and aftershock, indicating approximately linear response. The stiff-soil sites generally have moderate amplification (factors of 1.1–2.4) at 0.5 and 1 Hz. Amplifications at 1 and 5 Hz for all sites generally increase with decreasing shear-wave velocity measured in the top 30 m (Vs 30). However, larger amplifications at 0.5 and 1 Hz for sites with similar Vs 30 values are observed for sites in the Seattle Basin, illustrating the amplification from the deeper (>30 m) sediments and the contribution from basin surface waves. Record sections for the mainshock and aftershock show that basin surface waves produce the peak velocities for many of the sites in the Seattle Basin and often dominate the amplitude at 1 Hz and lower frequencies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. M. Atkinson and M. Macias Predicted Ground Motions for Great Interface Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1552 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Frankel, W. Stephenson, and D. Carver Sedimentary Basin Effects in Seattle, Washington: Ground-Motion Observations and 3D Simulations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1579 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Lawrence, P. Bodin, and C. A. Langston In Situ Measurements of Nonlinear and Nonequilibrium Dynamics in Shallow, Unconsolidated Sediments Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1650 - 1670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. G. Troost, K. G. Troost, and D. B Booth Geology of Seattle and the Seattle area, Washington Reviews in Engineering Geology, November 1, 2008; 20(0): 1 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Barberopoulou A Seiche Hazard Study for Lake Union, Seattle, Washington Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1837 - 1848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Castellaro, F. Mulargia, and P. L. Rossi Vs30: Proxy for Seismic Amplification? Seismological Research Letters, July 1, 2008; 79(4): 540 - 543. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Lawrence, P. Bodin, C. A. Langston, F. Pearce, J. Gomberg, P. A. Johnson, F.-Y. Menq, and T. Brackman Induced Dynamic Nonlinear Ground Response at Garner Valley, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1412 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Snelson, T. M. Brocher, K. C. Miller, T. L. Pratt, and A. M. Trehu Seismic Amplification within the Seattle Basin, Washington State: Insights from SHIPS Seismic Tomography Experiments Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1432 - 1448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. Cramer Quantifying the Uncertainty in Site Amplification Modeling and Its Effects on Site-Specific Seismic-Hazard Estimation in the Upper Mississippi Embayment and Adjacent Areas Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2008 - 2020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Barberopoulou, A. Qamar, T. L. Pratt, and W. P. Steele Long-Period Effects of the Denali Earthquake on Water Bodies in the Puget Lowland: Observations and Modeling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 519 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. Li, W. S. D. Wilcock, T. L. Pratt, C. M. Snelson, and T. M. Brocher Seismic Attenuation Structure of the Seattle Basin, Washington State, from Explosive-Source Refraction Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 553 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M. Brocher A Regional View of Urban Sedimentary Basins in Northern California Based on Oil Industry Compressional-Wave Velocity and Density Logs Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2093 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. F. Bonilla, R. J. Archuleta, and D. Lavallee Hysteretic and Dilatant Behavior of Cohesionless Soils and Their Effects on Nonlinear Site Response: Field Data Observations and Modeling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2373 - 2395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence for Widespread Nonlinear Strong Ground Motion in the MW 6.9 Loma Prieta Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1595 - 1608.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction of Nonlinear Soil Effects Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1609 - 1629.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validation of a 3D Velocity Model of the Puget Sound Region Based on Modeling Ground Motion from the 28 February 2001 Nisqually Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1670 - 1689.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site Response in Victoria, British Columbia, from Spectral Ratios and 1D Modeling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 1109 - 1124.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chimney Damage in the Greater Seattle Area from the Nisqually Earthquake of 28 February 2001 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 1143 - 1158.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Comparison of Ground Motions from the 2001 M 6.8 In-Slab Earthquakes in Cascadia and Japan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1823 - 1831.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amplification of Seismic Waves by the Seattle Basin, Washington State Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 533 - 545.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures of the Seismic Source in EMD-Based Characterization of the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake Recordings Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 501 - 518.
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
