Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2002; v. 92; no. 6;
p. 2163-2176; DOI: 10.1785/0120010262
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
3D Seismic Response of the Deep Basement Structure of the Granada Basin (Southern Spain)
S. Alejandro Gil-Zepeda,
Francisco Luzón,
Jorge Aguirre,
José Morales,
Francisco J. Sánchez-Sesma and
Carlos Ortiz-Alemán
Departamento de Física Aplicada
Universidad de
Almería
Cañada de San Urbano
s/n 04120 Almería,
Spain
(F.L.)
Instituto Andaluz de Geofísica y Prevención de
Desastres Sismicos
Universidad de Granada
Campus Universitario de
Cartuja
s/n 18071 Granada, Spain
(F.L., J.M.)
Instituto de Ingeniería, UNAM
Cd. Universitaria,
Apdo. 70-472
Coyoacán
04510 México D.F.,
México
(S.A.G.-Z., J.A., F.J.S.-S.)
Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo
Eje Central
152
07730, México D.F., México
(C.O.-A)
The Granada Basin is located in the southeast of Spain, in the central
sector of the Betic Cordilleras, in an area of high seismic hazard in the
Iberian Peninsula. This hazard is due, in part, to local ground-motion
amplification effects that have been observed at various locations in this
basin. In this work, we use the indirect boundary element method (IBEM) to
compute the three-dimensional (3D) seismic response of the deep structure of
the Granada Basin for incident P- and S-plane waves coming
from the south. We have analyzed the results in both frequency and time
domains, and for the range of frequencies that we have been able to compute
(between 0 and 0.312 Hz), the most relevant site effects are the local
amplifications produced inside the sediments. Generally speaking, the observed
amplification patterns of the displacements for incident SH waves are
the highest at those locations where the basin is deeper. For P and
SV waves, the "snapshots" show the amplification effects
of both radial and vertical components, when the direct waves cross the
Granada Basin. The amplification levels, with respect to the amplitude of the
incident wave, are not so large, because the impedance contrast between the
sediments and the bedrock (equal to 2.45) is relatively low. Moreover, two
perpendicular receiver profiles are used to analyze the wave propagation, and
we have observed the propagation of phases that can be identified as surface
waves along the two profiles. The Rayleigh waves propagate with more energy on
the forward direction (from south to north) of the incident body wave.
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America