|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Article |
Mission Research Corporation
735 State St.
P. O. Drawer
719
Santa Barbara, California 93102
(S.B.)
Mission Research Corporation
8560 Cinderbed Rd., Suite
700
Newington, Virginia 22122
(M.D.F.)
Southern Methodist University
Department of Physics
P. O.
Box 0175
Dallas, Texas 75275
(G.D.M.)
An approach is presented to calibrate and use regional P-S amplitude ratios to improve seismic-event characterization capabilities with regard to monitoring the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Data for presumed earthquakes are used to estimate distance corrections for Pn-Sn and Pn-Lg ratios in the 68-Hz pass-band for tectonic and stable-region types. The regional phase-amplitude ratios are further corrected for path variations using simple kriging. Simple kriging is derived using a Bayesian approach. A correction surface is determined for each type of amplitude ratio at each station as an optimal linear combination of existing amplitude-ratio data at the station, giving greater weight to calibration data nearer to the correction location. A corresponding uncertainty surface is also estimated in terms of the residual variance of the data and a calibration variance. For well-calibrated locations, the correction converges to the mean of nearby data, and the uncertainty converges to the residual variance. For locations far from calibration data, the correction surface converges to the worldwide average, with larger uncertainty. With these correction and uncertainty surfaces, corrected values of Pn/Smax(68 Hz) are obtained and used to define a hypothesis test that fixes the significance level with respect to misclassifying explosions. The criterion is applied to 140 explosions at known nuclear-test sites and to 4173 Reviewed Event Bulletin (REB) events above mb 3.5 (presumed to be mostly earthquakes) with regional recordings between 3° and 17°, Pn signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) >2.0, and Sn or Lg SNR >1.3. At a 0.005 significance level, none of the 140 explosions at any of the known nuclear-test sites are screened out, whereas about 78% of the REB events are screened out. Correcting regional P-S ratios for spatial variations improves the screening performance by about 25% over just correcting for distance. The screening results are fairly insensitive to estimates of parameters (correlation length, calibration variance, and residual variance) that are used, along with data, to compute the correction and uncertainty surfaces at each station.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. N. Anderson, W. R. Walter, D. K. Fagan, T. M. Mercier, and S. R. Taylor Regional Multistation Discriminants: Magnitude, Distance, and Amplitude Corrections, and Sources of Error Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 794 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Fisk and G. D. McCartor Treatment of Correlation for Clustered Reference Data in Kriging Regional Seismic Discriminants Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1768 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. He, X.-B. Xie, and T. Lay Explosion-Source Energy Partitioning and Lg-Wave Excitation: Contributions of Free-Surface Scattering Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 778 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Fisk Source Spectral Modeling of Regional P/S Discriminants at Nuclear Test Sites in China and the Former Soviet Union Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2348 - 2367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-B. Xie, Z. Ge, and T. Lay Investigating Explosion Source Energy Partitioning and Lg-Wave Excitation Using a Finite-Difference plus Slowness Analysis Method Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2412 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Accurate Locations of Nuclear Explosions at the Lop Nor Test Site Using Alignment of Seismograms and IKONOS Satellite Imagery Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 2911 - 2925. |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |