Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baher, S. Articles by Fuis, G. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Separation of Site Effects and Structural Focusing in Santa Monica, California: A Study of High-Frequency Weak Motions from Earthquakes and Blasts Recorded during the Los Angeles Region Seismic Experiment

Department of Earth and Space Sciences
University of California-Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California 90095
(S.B., P.M.D.)
U.S. Geological Survey
345 Middlefield Rd.
Menlo Park, California 91425
(G.F.)

Manuscript received 21 May 2001.

Near-surface site factors and the effects of deep structural focusing were estimated in the Santa Monica Mountains and Santa Monica, California, from a portable array of 75 seismic stations deployed during the Los Angeles Region Seismic Experiment, Phase II (LARSE II). The objective was to examine further the origin of seismic wave amplification in the region of intense damage south of the Santa Monica Fault from the Northridge earthquake. The analysis used normalized spectral amplitudes in the 4- to 8- and 8- to 12-Hz range in direct and coda waves from local earthquakes in Santa Paula, Northridge, Redlands, and Hector Mine. Coda waves indicated that site factor amplifications are larger south of the Santa Monica fault relative to the north. Spectral ratios of direct S waves, corrected for site effects, show additional amplification south of, and adjacent to, the Santa Monica fault, attributable to focusing by a deeper structure.

Gao et al. (1996) concluded that localized focusing effects contributed to anomalous P- and S-wave amplification in the Santa Monica damage zone for Northridge aftershocks within a specified range of azimuths. In an attempt to reproduce the hypothesized focusing from the Northridge earthquake, two shots (4000 and 3750 lb.) were detonated, one at Pyramid Lake, a distance of about 69 km to the north-northwest of central Santa Monica, and the other near Fort Tejon, a distance of 91 km. The azimuth of the shots was chosen to be that expected to give anomalous amplification. At these distances steeply incident seismic energy from Pg/PmP waves are expected to pass through the underground focusing structure and be selectively amplified. After the local site factors are removed, the waveforms from the Fort Tejon shot exhibited localized amplification adjacent to and south of the fault, 2-3 times larger than that of the surrounding area. The effect is less for waves from the Pyramid Lake shot, which could be due to their higher angle of incidence. The observations lend support to the argument that deep structural focusing is an important factor in determining azimuth-dependent amplification of seismic waves along a basin edge.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Pettenati and L. Sirovich Validation of the Intensity-Based Source Inversions of Three Destructive California Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1587 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Study of Possible Ground-Motion Amplification at the Coyote Lake Dam, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2004; 94(4): 1327 - 1342.

				Chimney Damage in the Greater Seattle Area from the Nisqually Earthquake of 28 February 2001 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 1143 - 1158.

				Estimated Ground Motion From the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake at the Site of the Interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard Bridge Collapse, West Los Angeles, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2737 - 2751.