Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yu, J. Articles by Haines, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The Choice of Reference Sites for Seismic Ground Amplification Analyses: Case Study at Parkway, New Zealand

Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences
P.O. Box 30368
Lower Hutt, New Zealand
(J.Y.)

Bullard Laboratories
Cambridge CB3 0EZ, United Kingdom
(J.H.)

This article focuses on how close reference rock sites need to be to the sites of interest when using the standard spectral ratio technique to obtain consistent estimates of site amplifications reflecting behavior of seismic waves at the sites of interest. Taber and Smith (1992) and Chávez-García et al. (1999) obtained very different amplification factors for the Parkway Basin, New Zealand, using reference sites only 2 km apart. We analyze 34 earthquakes recorded by a dense 2D array of 19 soil sites in the basin and 4 rock sites fringing the basin. Spectral ratios are calculated separately relative to Taber and Smith's reference site P01, 2 km from the basin, and to a hypothetical average rock site, PR, formed from the four local rock sites, including reference site P25 of Chávez-García et al. Our spectral ratios of the soil sites relative to PR are remarkably consistent, with a distribution of the dominant peaks at 8.4 ± 2.0 at 1.7 ± 0.3 Hz. In contrast, the spectral ratios relative to P01 are much less consistent, and the dominant peak ratios are widely scattered around two separate centers of 14.5 ± 4.1 at 1.8 ± 0.3 Hz and 14.4 ± 5.5 at 4.7 ± 1.0 Hz. Our results relative to the two references are similar to those obtained by Chávez-García et al. and Taber and Smith, respectively. We find that extreme differences between the two are often associated with the occurrence of troughs in the amplitude spectra at P01, possibly due to topographic deamplification there relative to the Parkway Basin in some but not all earthquakes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Read, H. El Naggar, and D. Eaton Site-Response Spectra for POLARIS Station Sites in Southern Ontario and Quebec Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2008; 79(6): 776 - 784. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Pratt and T. M. Brocher Site Response and Attenuation in the Puget Lowland, Washington State Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 536 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. J. Chavez-Garcia, M. Rodriguez, and W. R. Stephenson An Alternative Approach to the SPAC Analysis of Microtremors: Exploiting Stationarity of Noise Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2005; 95(1): 277 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Reply to "Comment on `3D Site Effects: A Thorough Analysis of a High-Quality Dataset,' by F. J. Chavez-Garcia, J. Castillo, and W. R. Stephenson," by R. Paolucci and E. Faccioli Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 2306 - 2316.