|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Article |
Dept. of Earth Sciences
Carleton University
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada K1S 5B6
gma{at}ccs.carleton.ca
(G.M.A.)
U.S. Geological Survey
345 Middlefield Rd.
Menlo Park, California 94025
boore{at}usgs.gov
(D.M.B.)
Manuscript received 15 July 2002.
Ground-motion relations for earthquakes that occur in subduction zones are an important input to seismic-hazard analyses in many parts of the world. In the Cascadia region (Washington, Oregon, northern California, and British Columbia), for example, there is a significant hazard from megathrust earthquakes along the subduction interface and from large events within the subducting slab. These hazards are in addition to the hazard from shallow earthquakes in the overlying crust. We have compiled a response spectra database from thousands of strong-motion recordings from events of moment magnitude (M) 5-8.3 occurring in subduction zones around the world, including both interface and in-slab events. The 2001 M 6.8 Nisqually and 1999 M 5.9 Satsop earthquakes are included in the database, as are many records from subduction zones in Japan (Kyoshin-Net data), Mexico (Guerrero data), and Central America. The size of the database is four times larger than that available for previous empirical regressions to determine ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes. The large dataset enables improved determination of attenuation parameters and magnitude scaling, for both interface and in-slab events. Soil response parameters are also better determined by the data.
We use the database to develop global ground-motion relations for interface and in-slab earthquakes, using a maximum likelihood regression method. We analyze regional variability of ground-motion amplitudes across the global database and find that there are significant regional differences. In particular, amplitudes in Cascadia differ by more than a factor of 2 from those in Japan for the same magnitude, distance, event type, and National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) soil class. This is believed to be due to regional differences in the depth of the soil profile, which are not captured by the NEHRP site classification scheme. Regional correction factors to account for these differences are proposed for Cascadia and Japan.
The results of this study differ significantly from previous analyses based on more limited data and have important implications for seismic-hazard analysis. The ground-motion relations predict that a great megathrust earthquake (M 
8) at a fault distance of about 100 km would produce pseudoacceleration (PSA), 5% damped, horizontal component on soil sites of about 110 cm/sec2 at 0.5 Hz, 660 cm/sec2 at 2.5 Hz, and 410 cm/sec2 at 5 Hz, with a peak ground acceleration of about 180 cm/sec2. These damaging levels of motion would be experienced over a very large area, corresponding to a rectangular area about 300 km wide by 500 km long. Large in-slab events (M 7.5) would produce even higher PSA values within 100 km of the fault, but the in-slab motions attenuate much more rapidly with distance. Thus the hazard posed by moderate to large in-slab events such as the 2001 Nisqually earthquake is modest compared to that of a Cascadia megathrust earthquake of M 8, in terms of the area that would experience damaging levels of ground motion.
Online material: table of data used in the regression analysis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Goda and G. M. Atkinson Probabilistic Characterization of Spatially Correlated Response Spectra for Earthquakes in Japan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 3003 - 3020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Atkinson and M. Morrison Observations on Regional Variability in Ground-Motion Amplitudes for Small-to-Moderate Earthquakes in North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2393 - 2409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Boore, A. A. Skarlatoudis, B. N. Margaris, C. B. Papazachos, and C. Ventouzi Along-Arc and Back-Arc Attenuation, Site Response, and Source Spectrum for the Intermediate-Depth 8 January 2006 M 6.7 Kythera, Greece, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2410 - 2434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Goldfinger, J. Patton, A. Morey, and C. H. Nelson Reply to "Comment on 'Late Holocene Rupture of the Northern San Andreas Fault and Possible Stress Linkage to the Cascadia Subduction Zone' by Chris Goldfinger, Kelly Grijalva, Roland Burgmann, Ann E. Morey, Joel E. Johnson, C. Hans Nelson, Julia Gutierrez-Pastor, Andrew Ericsson, Eugene Karabanov, Jason D. Chaytor, Jason Patton, and Eulalia Gracia" by Ganapathy Shanmugam Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2599 - 2606. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Garcia, S. K. Singh, M. Herraiz, M. Ordaz, and J. Francisco Pacheco Erratum to Inslab Earthquakes of Central Mexico: Peak Ground-Motion Parameters and Response Spectra Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2607 - 2609. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Atkinson and M. Macias Predicted Ground Motions for Great Interface Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1552 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Wang Comment on "Sigma: Issues, Insights, and Challenges" by F. O. Strasser, N. A. Abrahamson, and J. J. Bommer Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2009; 80(3): 491 - 493. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. Skarlatoudis, C. B. Papazachos, B. N. Margaris, Ch. Papaioannou, Ch. Ventouzi, D. Vamvakaris, A. Bruestle, T. Meier, W. Friederich, G. Stavrakakis, et al. Combination of Acceleration-Sensor and Broadband Velocity-Sensor Recordings for Attenuation Studies: The Case of the 8 January 2006 Kythera Intermediate-Depth Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 694 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. O. Strasser, N. A. Abrahamson, and J. J. Bommer Sigma: Issues, Insights, and Challenges Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 40 - 56. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Atkinson and D. M. Boore Erratum to Empirical Ground-Motion Relations for Subduction Zone Earthquakes and Their Application to Cascadia and Other Regions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2567 - 2569. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Macias, G. M. Atkinson, and D. Motazedian Ground-Motion Attenuation, Source, and Site Effects for the 26 September 2003 M 8.1 Tokachi-Oki Earthquake Sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1947 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Fatehi and R. B. Herrmann High-Frequency Ground-Motion Scaling in the Pacific Northwest and in Northern and Central California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 709 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-S. Lin and C.-T. Lee Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction-Zone Earthquakes in Northeastern Taiwan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 220 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Akkar and J. J. Bommer Empirical Prediction Equations for Peak Ground Velocity Derived from Strong-Motion Records from Europe and the Middle East Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 511 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. M. Atkinson Challenges in seismic hazard analysis for continental interiors Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 425(0): 329 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Petersen, T. Cao, K. W. Campbell, and A. D. Frankel Time-independent and Time-dependent Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California: Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model 1.0 Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 99 - 109. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Ichinose, H. K. Thio, and P. G. Somerville Moment Tensor and Rupture Model for the 1949 Olympia, Washington, Earthquake and Scaling Relations for Cascadia and Global Intraslab Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1029 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Cao, M. D. Petersen, and A. D. Frankel Model Uncertainties of the 2002 Update of California Seismic Hazard Maps Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2040 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Garcia, S. K. Singh, M. Herraiz, M. Ordaz, and J. F. Pacheco Inslab Earthquakes of Central Mexico: Peak Ground-Motion Parameters and Response Spectra Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2272 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inslab Earthquakes of Central Mexico: Q, Source Spectra, and Stress Drop Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 789 - 802.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Boore Estimating Vs(30) (or NEHRP Site Classes) from Shallow Velocity Models (Depths < 30 m) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 591 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
