Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2003; v. 93; no. 6; p. 2516-2530; DOI: 10.1785/0120030006
© 2003 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henke, R.
Right arrow Articles by Henke, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Selected Issues Regarding the Torsional Cylindrical Impulse Shear Test

Robert Henke and Wanda K. Henke

Dynamic In Situ Geotechnical Testing, Inc.
7 Wytchwood Court, #T-1
Baltimore, Maryland 21209

Manuscript received 3 January 2003.

This article discusses selected issues addressed by a 2002 field torsional cylindrical impulse shear testing program carried out at the National Geotechnical Experimentation Site on Treasure Island in the San Francisco Bay. The impulse shear test is a new in situ geotechnical testing method that provides detailed information, for soil deposits, on in situ nonlinear inelastic shearing deformation characteristics needed for dynamic geotechnical earthquake analysis procedures. One purpose of the Treasure Island testing program was to initiate a definitive verification of this capability. Previous field testing programs we had carried out were preliminary evaluations that focused largely on operability issues. Additionally, recent findings suggest that the impulse shear test may have the potential for providing reasonably precise indications of in situ resistances of soil deposits to liquefaction and related deformations. A second purpose of the Treasure Island testing program was to further explore this possibility. The Treasure Island site is a particularly relevant site for the subject investigation. The site consists of a layer of saturated loose sandy soils underlain by a medium-stiff clay layer. Such a sequence has proven to be extraordinarily hazardous during past earthquakes. The clay layer can amplify ground motions greatly, and the sandy layer tends to liquefy. The results of our testing program suggest that the impulse shear test is (1) a viable means for estimating in situ nonlinear inelastic shearing deformation characteristics of soil deposits and (2) a promising approach for obtaining reasonably precise indications of in situ resistances of soils to liquefaction and related deformations.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America