Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2003; v. 93; no. 6; p. 2758-2761; DOI: 10.1785/0120030043
© 2003 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pujol, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Note

Determination of a Local Magnitude Scale: A Generalized Inverse Solution

Jose Pujol

Center for Earthquake Research and Information
The University of Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee 38152
pujol{at}ceri.memphis.edu

Manuscript received 27 February 2003.

Current techniques for the development of a local magnitude scale involve the simultaneous determination of the following: the magnitudes of a number of earthquakes, site-specific correction terms for each of the recording stations, and the two constants in the equation used to represent the variation of amplitude as a function of distance. The relation between these parameters and wave amplitudes is linear, and solving the corresponding system of equations can be achieved in one step when the number of events and stations is relatively small. When the number is so large that this approach is not practical, the solution is obtained iteratively, which requires initial estimates for the values of the parameters, but as shown here, it is possible to solve the system in two noniterative steps without starting values. To achieve this simplification the method of separation of parameters, introduced in the context of the joint hypocentral determination, is used.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. Dineva and R. Mereu
Energy Magnitude: A Case Study for Southern Ontario/Western Quebec (Canada)
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 136 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Keir, G. W. Stuart, A. Jackson, and A. Ayele
Local Earthquake Magnitude Scale and Seismicity Rate for the Ethiopian Rift
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2221 - 2230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America