Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Graves, R. W. Articles by Wald, D. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Observed and Simulated Ground Motions in the San Bernardino Basin Region for the Hector Mine, California, Earthquake

URS Group, Inc.
566 El Dorado Street
Pasadena, California 91101
robert_graves{at}urscorp.com
(R.W.G.)

U.S. Geological Survey
1711 Illinois Street
Golden, Colorado 80401
wald{at}usgs.gov
(D.J.W.)

During the M_w 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, peak ground velocities recorded at sites in the central San Bernardino basin region were up to 2 times larger and had significantly longer durations of strong shaking than sites just outside the basin. To better understand the effects of 3D structure on the long-period ground-motion response in this region, we have performed finite-difference simulations for this earthquake. The simulations are numerically accurate for periods of 2 sec and longer and incorporate the detailed spatial and temporal heterogeneity of source rupture, as well as complex 3D basin structure. Here, we analyze three models of the San Bernardino basin: model A (with structural constraints from gravity and seismic reflection data), model F (water well and seismic refraction data), and the Southern California Earthquake Center version 3 model (hydrologic and seismic refraction data). Models A and F are characterized by a gradual increase in sediment thickness toward the south with an abrupt step-up in the basement surface across the San Jacinto fault. The basin structure in the SCEC version 3 model has a nearly uniform sediment thickness of 1 km with little basement topography along the San Jacinto fault. In models A and F, we impose a layered velocity structure within the sediments based on the seismic refraction data and an assumed depth-dependent V_p/V_s ratio. Sediment velocities within the SCEC version 3 model are given by a smoothly varying rule-based function that is calibrated to the seismic refraction measurements. Due to computational limitations, the minimum shear-wave velocity is fixed at 600 m/sec in all of the models. Ground-motion simulations for both models A and F provide a reasonably good match to the amplitude and waveform characteristics of the recorded motions. In these models, surface waves are generated as energy enters the basin through the gradually sloping northern margin. Due to the basement step along the San Jacinto fault, the surface wave energy is confined to the region north of this structure, consistent with the observations. The SCEC version 3 model, lacking the basin geometry complexity present in the other two models, fails to provide a satisfactory match to the characteristics of the observed motions. Our study demonstrates the importance of using detailed and accurate basin geometry for predicting ground motions and also highlights the utility of integrating geological, geophysical, and seismological observations in the development and validation of 3D velocity models.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Stupazzini, R. Paolucci, and H. Igel Near-Fault Earthquake Ground-Motion Simulation in the Grenoble Valley by a High-Performance Spectral Element Code Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2009; 99(1): 286 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Harmsen, S. Hartzell, and P. Liu Simulated Ground Motion in Santa Clara Valley, California, and Vicinity from M>=6.7 Scenario Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1243 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. Graves The Seismic Response of the San Bernardino Basin Region during the 2001 Big Bear Lake Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 241 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Plesch, J. H. Shaw, C. Benson, W. A. Bryant, S. Carena, M. Cooke, J. Dolan, G. Fuis, E. Gath, L. Grant, et al. Community Fault Model (CFM) for Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 1793 - 1802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kaser, P. M. Mai, and M. Dumbser Accurate Calculation of Fault-Rupture Models Using the High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Tetrahedral Meshes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1570 - 1586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G.-Q. Wang, G.-Q. Tang, D. M. Boore, G. Van Ness Burbach, C. R. Jackson, X.-Y. Zhou, and Q.-L. Lin Surface Waves in the Western Taiwan Coastal Plain from an Aftershock of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 821 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]