|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Note |
University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Department of Geology and Geophysics
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
In this note, we expand on a previous study of strong ground motions in extensional tectonic regimes by Spudich et al. (1999). First, we correct the predictive relations they determined for horizontal peak ground acceleration and 5% damped pseudovelocity response for an approximately 20% overprediction of rock-site data that they noted in their article. Second, we regress data compiled in their study to determine a predictive relation for geometric mean horizontal peak ground velocity. Peak ground velocity estimates are needed to apply some commonly used methods for predicting earthquake damage and Modified Mercalli intensities. However, there are few other recently published predictive relations for peak ground velocityand none that are specifically designed for use in extensional tectonic regimes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Akkar and J. J. Bommer Empirical Prediction Equations for Peak Ground Velocity Derived from Strong-Motion Records from Europe and the Middle East Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 511 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Pankow and J. C. Pechmann The SEA99 Ground-Motion Predictive Relations for Extensional Tectonic Regimes: Revisions and a New Peak Ground Velocity Relation Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 364 - 364. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Halldorsson and A. S. Papageorgiou Calibration of the Specific Barrier Model to Earthquakes of Different Tectonic Regions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1276 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |