Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2004; v. 94; no. 2; p. 493-505; DOI: 10.1785/0120030094
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mechanical Validation of the Three-Dimensional Intersection Geometry between the Puente Hills Blind-Thrust System and the Whittier Fault, Los Angeles, California

W. A. Griffith* and M. L. Cooke

Department of Geosciences
University of Massachusetts
Amherst, Massachusetts 01003

Manuscript received 13 May 2003.

The sensitivity of fault interaction to alternative, kinematically plausible intersection geometries of the Puente Hills blind-thrust system and the Whittier fault is modeled under geodetically constrained horizontal contraction. Comparisons of modeled slip rates to available geologic rates (1) suggest that the Coyote Hills segment of the Puente Hills system extends to the base of the seismogenic crust and (2) give slight preference for extension of the active Whittier fault to the base of the seismogenic crust rather than limiting active slip to the hanging wall of the Coyote Hills fault. Furthermore, analysis of strain energy density demonstrates that the preferred model has the greatest mechanical efficiency. This correlation of fit to geologic slip rates and mechanical efficiency supports the effectiveness of this method for evaluating among alternative geometries in the absence of geologically constrained slip rates. The methodology implemented in this study may be effectively used in future studies of deformation within fault systems.

Model-generated slip rates along the Puente Hills faults show significant strike slip, implying that seismic hazard of these faults may be underestimated by considering reverse-slip rates alone. Contraction at 036° may not be appropriate in the Puente Hills region because of resulting sinistral slip on the Whittier fault, which disagrees with paleoseisimc observations; however, Whittier strike-slip rates fit paleoseismic rates under 006.5° contraction. Because strike-slip rates are more sensitive to contraction direction than fault intersection geometry, contraction direction should be further constrained in order to accurately assess seismic hazard on these faults.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. T. Marshall, M. L. Cooke, and S. E. Owen
Effects of Nonplanar Fault Topology and Mechanical Interaction on Fault-Slip Distributions in the Ventura Basin, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1113 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. J. Meigs, M. L. Cooke, and S. T. Marshall
Using Vertical Rock Uplift Patterns to Constrain the Three-Dimensional Fault Configuration in the Los Angeles Basin
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 106 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. A. Griffith and M. L. Cooke
How Sensitive Are Fault-Slip Rates in the Los Angeles Basin to Tectonic Boundary Conditions?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1263 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America