Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2004; v. 94; no. 3; p. 961-976; DOI: 10.1785/0120030020
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Akamatsu, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

A Method to Estimate Phase Velocities of Rayleigh Waves Using Microseisms Simultaneously Observed at Two Sites

Hitoshi Morikawa*, Sumio Sawada and Junpei Akamatsu

Department of Built Environment
Tokyo Institute of Technology
4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan
(H.M.)

Disaster Prevention Research Institute
Kyoto University
Gokasho, Uji
Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
(S.S. and J.A.)

The frequency-wave number (F-K) method and the spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method can both be applied to estimate the subsurface structure by using array observations of long-period (1–10 sec) microtremors. Since these methods require more than four to seven sets of simultaneous recordings, the allocation of many resources, not only of instruments, but also of personnel, must be provided for the observations. To avoid this difficulty, we propose an alternative method based on the conventional SPAC method. It is called the two-site SPAC (2sSPAC) method and requires only two sets of seismographs under the assumption that the wave fields are spatially and temporally stationary. After formulating the analytical background of the 2sSPAC method, we use data from actual microtremors to discuss the limitations of the assumption and the applicability of this method through a comparison with conventional methods. This discussion leads to the conclusion that the 2sSPAC method provides reasonable values for phase velocities in the frequency range lower than about 1.0 Hz at the sites studied.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Tada, I. Cho, and Y. Shinozaki
New Circular-Array Microtremor Techniques to Infer Love-Wave Phase Velocities
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2912 - 2926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. Morikawa and S. Udagawa
A Method to Estimate the Phase Velocities of Microtremors Using a Time-Frequency Analysis and Its Applications
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 774 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Tada, I. Cho, and Y. Shinozaki
Beyond the SPAC Method: Exploiting the Wealth of Circular-Array Methods for Microtremor Exploration
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2080 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America